From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-21742-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.dk>
Received: (qmail 27435 invoked from network); 21 Sep 2005 03:42:19 -0000
Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 21 Sep 2005 03:42:19 -0000
Received: (qmail 45769 invoked from network); 21 Sep 2005 03:42:13 -0000
Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90)
  by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 21 Sep 2005 03:42:13 -0000
Received: (qmail 11580 invoked by alias); 21 Sep 2005 03:42:09 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 21742
Received: (qmail 11571 invoked from network); 21 Sep 2005 03:42:08 -0000
Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88)
  by sunsite.dk with SMTP; 21 Sep 2005 03:42:08 -0000
Received: (qmail 45479 invoked from network); 21 Sep 2005 03:42:08 -0000
Received: from dsl3-63-249-88-2.cruzio.com (HELO dot.blorf.net) (63.249.88.2)
  by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 21 Sep 2005 03:42:07 -0000
Received: by dot.blorf.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id DDF408DA1; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 20:42:06 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 20:42:06 -0700
From: Wayne Davison <wayned@users.sourceforge.net>
To: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Cc: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk
Subject: Re: Prompt oddity when running as "sh" (4.3.0-dev)
Message-ID: <20050921034206.GA2955@blorf.net>
References: <1050920160050.ZM9532@candle.brasslantern.com> <20050920163045.GE28681@blorf.net> <1050921021110.ZM9892@candle.brasslantern.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1050921021110.ZM9892@candle.brasslantern.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham 
	version=3.0.4

On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 02:11:10AM +0000, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> Shouldn't that be "%B%S%#%s%b" ?  (That was my original suggestion, in
> any event.)            ^^

I'm not sure why we'd want the character to change between % and #
depending on the user being root.  What was your reasoning?

..wayne..