From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-22078-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.dk>
Received: (qmail 9634 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2005 19:07:01 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=ham version=3.1.0
Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 14 Dec 2005 19:07:01 -0000
Received: (qmail 90196 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2005 19:06:55 -0000
Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90)
  by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 14 Dec 2005 19:06:55 -0000
Received: (qmail 17835 invoked by alias); 14 Dec 2005 19:06:53 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 22078
Received: (qmail 17826 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2005 19:06:52 -0000
Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88)
  by sunsite.dk with SMTP; 14 Dec 2005 19:06:52 -0000
Received: (qmail 89925 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2005 19:06:52 -0000
Received: from dsl3-63-249-88-2.cruzio.com (HELO dot.blorf.net) (63.249.88.2)
  by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 14 Dec 2005 19:06:52 -0000
Received: by dot.blorf.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 464434DD3; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 11:06:50 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 11:06:50 -0800
From: Wayne Davison <wayned@users.sourceforge.net>
To: Peter Stephenson <pws@csr.com>
Cc: Zsh hackers list <zsh-workers@sunsite.dk>
Subject: Re: PATCH: assume "enhanced goodness" when --multibyte-enable
Message-ID: <20051214190650.GD16818@dot.blorf.net>
References: <200512141822.jBEIMPjF027531@news01.csr.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200512141822.jBEIMPjF027531@news01.csr.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11

On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 06:22:25PM +0000, Peter Stephenson wrote:
> Hence I think we need to make the same assumption in utils.c, too.

That certainly seems right to me.

The first hunk in your diff makes me wonder:  why isn't ucs4toutf8()
declared as static?  It is only used inside utils.c, and it sometimes
doesn't even get defined.

..wayne..