From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19055 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2006 18:59:10 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 11 Feb 2006 18:59:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 66285 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2006 18:59:04 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 11 Feb 2006 18:59:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 11252 invoked by alias); 11 Feb 2006 18:59:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 22231 Received: (qmail 11239 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2006 18:59:00 -0000 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by sunsite.dk with SMTP; 11 Feb 2006 18:59:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 66018 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2006 18:59:00 -0000 Received: from dsl3-63-249-88-2.cruzio.com (HELO dot.blorf.net) (63.249.88.2) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 11 Feb 2006 18:58:59 -0000 Received: by dot.blorf.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 003A060F8; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 10:58:57 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 10:58:57 -0800 From: Wayne Davison To: Zsh-workers Subject: Re: [SOLVED] Libtool/zsh quoting problem: a zsh... bug? Message-ID: <20060211185857.GB30984@dot.blorf.net> References: <20060209233201.GA5875@fargo> <20060211093607.GD10579@DervishD> <200602111321.48602.arvidjaar@newmail.ru> <20060211181440.GA30984@dot.blorf.net> <20060211182254.GA24111@DervishD> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060211182254.GA24111@DervishD> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 07:22:54PM +0100, DervishD wrote: > I think this is correct, because anyway using both "=" and double > quotes doesn't make much sense... Yeah, it may not make a lot of sense, but I've changed my mind on what I think should be done: if the user told us to word-split the result (e.g. ${=foo+">$foo<"}, I now think we should just word-split it. ..wayne..