From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22376 invoked from network); 31 May 2006 01:08:34 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.2 (2006-05-25) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=ham version=3.1.2 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 31 May 2006 01:08:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 78631 invoked from network); 31 May 2006 01:08:29 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 31 May 2006 01:08:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 1582 invoked by alias); 31 May 2006 01:08:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 22475 Received: (qmail 1573 invoked from network); 31 May 2006 01:08:25 -0000 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by sunsite.dk with SMTP; 31 May 2006 01:08:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 78343 invoked from network); 31 May 2006 01:08:25 -0000 Received: from dsl-63-249-88-2.cruzio.com (HELO dot.blorf.net) (63.249.88.2) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 31 May 2006 01:08:25 -0000 Received: by dot.blorf.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 61A21C4B2; Tue, 30 May 2006 18:08:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 18:08:23 -0700 From: Wayne Davison To: Peter Stephenson Cc: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: Vanishing files ? Message-ID: <20060531010823.GA15729@blorf.net> References: <20060530184859.1185ebdc.pws@csr.com> <200605302229.k4UMTPiv031244@pwslaptop.csr.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200605302229.k4UMTPiv031244@pwslaptop.csr.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 11:29:25PM +0100, Peter Stephenson wrote: > I won't bore you with the patch, instead check it straight in; > see changes in utils.c for the important bit. Cool! Things are looking good so far. > If anyone wants to supplement this with varargs support, be my guest. Hopefully that won't be necessary. I know that rsync has just used stdarg for its variable-arg functions, and I haven't seen anyone complain about it yet. ..wayne..