From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26846 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2006 16:29:14 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.6 (2006-10-03) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=ham version=3.1.6 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 9 Oct 2006 16:29:14 -0000 Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at sunsite.dk does not designate permitted sender hosts) Received: (qmail 82923 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2006 16:29:06 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 9 Oct 2006 16:29:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 3430 invoked by alias); 9 Oct 2006 16:29:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 22850 Received: (qmail 3414 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2006 16:29:02 -0000 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by sunsite.dk with SMTP; 9 Oct 2006 16:29:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 82634 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2006 16:29:02 -0000 Received: from flock1.newmail.ru (80.68.241.157) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 9 Oct 2006 16:29:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 16347 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2006 16:28:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cooker.local) (arvidjaar@newmail.ru@85.141.101.60) by smtpd.newmail.ru with SMTP; 9 Oct 2006 16:28:58 -0000 From: Andrey Borzenkov To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: quest for bld_line (was: Re: Stuff to do) Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 20:28:44 +0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <200609271211.k8RCBW5N023914@news01.csr.com> <200610081938.38620.arvidjaar@newmail.ru> <20061009130024.76925819.pws@csr.com> In-Reply-To: <20061009130024.76925819.pws@csr.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200610092028.50896.arvidjaar@newmail.ru> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 09 October 2006 16:00, Peter Stephenson wrote: > Andrey Borzenkov wrote: > > The point of patch is to replace exhaustive enumeration of all possible > > combinations by comparison of patterns. I.e. it checks if two patterns > > may have something in common - this can be generalized later using > > different pattern representations. > > > > I would be happy if we could just toss away this function. > > > > Comments? > > I don't know enough about this stage of completion to comment in any > detail, but it certainly looks like we need to do something about > it... to avoid duplication of efforts - I know now how to do it properly (that is, to preserve full functionality without relying on current fixed 256 byte tables), I just have to find some time to write it down. > I'll try this locally. (There's a word wrapped early on which is > preventing it applying but the fix is obvious.) sorry for this; every time I hope kmail has more common sense to not do it -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFKnjCR6LMutpd94wRAj/NAJ9yLWog2MQ1ZY//ri6qEU2+Gao/RwCfbMo5 GtcjO5630G0KqQJQzC/VF1g= =A6m8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----