From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22143 invoked from network); 26 May 2007 01:25:58 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.0 (2007-05-01) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=3.2.0 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 26 May 2007 01:25:58 -0000 Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at sunsite.dk does not designate permitted sender hosts) Received: (qmail 72396 invoked from network); 26 May 2007 01:25:51 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 26 May 2007 01:25:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 256 invoked by alias); 26 May 2007 01:25:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 23469 Received: (qmail 247 invoked from network); 26 May 2007 01:25:49 -0000 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by sunsite.dk with SMTP; 26 May 2007 01:25:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 72161 invoked from network); 26 May 2007 01:25:49 -0000 Received: from acolyte.scowler.net (216.254.112.45) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 26 May 2007 01:25:46 -0000 Received: by acolyte.scowler.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 46D835C284; Fri, 25 May 2007 21:25:45 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 21:25:45 -0400 From: Clint Adams To: Bart Schaefer Cc: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: using getaddrinfo/getnameinfo Message-ID: <20070526012545.GA14364@scowler.net> Mail-Followup-To: Bart Schaefer , zsh-workers@sunsite.dk References: <20070523195532.GA7139@scowler.net> <070523192537.ZM7842@torch.brasslantern.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <070523192537.ZM7842@torch.brasslantern.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 07:25:37PM -0700, Bart Schaefer wrote: > Wouldn't it be better to #ifdef it on a configure parameter? Prefer the > newer functions if they are present, obviously. Possibly, though given its intrusiveness, that'd look a tad messy, and I presumed that getaddrinfo() was pretty prevalent. I'll run it through diff -D a bit later.