From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24123 invoked from network); 3 Jun 2007 19:14:06 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.0 (2007-05-01) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=3.2.0 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 3 Jun 2007 19:14:06 -0000 Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at sunsite.dk does not designate permitted sender hosts) Received: (qmail 59878 invoked from network); 3 Jun 2007 19:14:00 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 3 Jun 2007 19:14:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 4659 invoked by alias); 3 Jun 2007 19:13:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 23512 Received: (qmail 4649 invoked from network); 3 Jun 2007 19:13:57 -0000 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by sunsite.dk with SMTP; 3 Jun 2007 19:13:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 59617 invoked from network); 3 Jun 2007 19:13:57 -0000 Received: from smtp01.cdmon.com (86.109.99.230) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 3 Jun 2007 19:13:53 -0000 Received: from localhost (212.Red-80-35-44.staticIP.rima-tde.net [80.35.44.212]) by smtp01.cdmon.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62BC5F83D2; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 21:13:59 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 21:16:03 +0200 From: DervishD To: Peter Stephenson Cc: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: [Bug] ZSH segmentation fault Message-ID: <20070603191603.GA3660@DervishD> Mail-Followup-To: Peter Stephenson , zsh-workers@sunsite.dk References: <20070603164356.GA21731@DervishD> <200706031736.l53HaAJI003047@pws-pc.ntlworld.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <200706031736.l53HaAJI003047@pws-pc.ntlworld.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Organization: DervishD Hi Peter :) * Peter Stephenson dixit: > DervishD wrote: > > While I understand that running such scripts is very unusual, I > > think that just segfaulting is not a correct way of dealing with errors. > > I didn't claim it was, indeed I think I implied the opposite. As I said, I wasn't critizising O:) and I didn't want to sound rude, but my english is a bit on the poor side ;) I understood, from your message, that you were implying that fixing that behaviour wasn't really worth the effort. Sorry for that ;) > I can easily work around this one, though even this isn't completely > trivial. I suppose. Zsh sources are not exactly easy to follow. I don't really know how can you fix the bugs SO FAST!. It's amazing. Thanks for the fix :) Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado -- Linux Registered User 88736 | http://www.dervishd.net It's my PC and I'll cry if I want to... RAmen!