From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27714 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2007 14:35:14 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 15 Oct 2007 14:35:14 -0000 Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at sunsite.dk does not designate permitted sender hosts) Received: (qmail 7404 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2007 14:35:08 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 15 Oct 2007 14:35:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 26907 invoked by alias); 15 Oct 2007 14:35:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 23959 Received: (qmail 26891 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2007 14:35:04 -0000 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by sunsite.dk with SMTP; 15 Oct 2007 14:35:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 6882 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2007 14:35:04 -0000 Received: from acolyte.scowler.net (216.254.112.45) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 15 Oct 2007 14:34:59 -0000 Received: by acolyte.scowler.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B414F5C58D; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 10:34:56 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 10:34:56 -0400 From: Clint Adams To: Peter Stephenson Cc: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: PATCH: make curses module not need wideness Message-ID: <20071015143456.GA4979@scowler.net> Mail-Followup-To: Peter Stephenson , zsh-workers@sunsite.dk References: <20071014042142.GA27713@scowler.net> <071014092646.ZM21802@torch.brasslantern.com> <20071014170856.GA14631@scowler.net> <071014151608.ZM26588@torch.brasslantern.com> <200710150911.l9F9BqR1003986@news01.csr.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200710150911.l9F9BqR1003986@news01.csr.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-11) On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 10:11:52AM +0100, Peter Stephenson wrote: > I think it would probably be better to let the windows have arbitrary names > and store them in a linked list, as we do for ztcp and zftp. Presumably > there aren't going to be that many of them. (The names can still be > numbers, obviously.) So have a struct containing just the WINDOW pointer and some kind of identifier? Should there be a special assoc parameter containing pointers?