From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-24478-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.dk>
Received: (qmail 13940 invoked from network); 28 Jan 2008 22:47:05 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	version=3.2.4
Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 28 Jan 2008 22:47:05 -0000
Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at sunsite.dk does not designate permitted sender hosts)
Received: (qmail 1808 invoked from network); 28 Jan 2008 22:46:58 -0000
Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90)
  by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 28 Jan 2008 22:46:58 -0000
Received: (qmail 8501 invoked by alias); 28 Jan 2008 22:46:54 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 24478
Received: (qmail 8486 invoked from network); 28 Jan 2008 22:46:53 -0000
Received: from bifrost.dotsrc.org (130.225.254.106)
  by sunsite.dk with SMTP; 28 Jan 2008 22:46:53 -0000
Received: from dot.blorf.net (dsl-74-220-69-132.cruzio.com [74.220.69.132])
	by bifrost.dotsrc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7451280190F6
	for <zsh-workers@sunsite.dk>; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 23:46:50 +0100 (CET)
Received: by dot.blorf.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id DF1A0935; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 14:46:47 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 14:46:47 -0800
From: Wayne Davison <wayned@users.sourceforge.net>
To: Peter Stephenson <pws@csr.com>
Cc: Zsh hackers list <zsh-workers@sunsite.dk>
Subject: Re: 4.3.5?
Message-ID: <20080128224647.GD8669@blorf.net>
References: <29916.1201513253@csr.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <29916.1201513253@csr.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.91.2/5589/Mon Jan 28 22:40:10 2008 on bifrost
X-Virus-Status: Clean

On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 09:40:53AM +0000, Peter Stephenson wrote:
> Is it worth continuing to wait?

It would be good to make sure that _git completion didn't end up broken
with the recent commits.  I'll be checking on this soon, but others my
know for sure already.

..wayne..