From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29356 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2008 00:25:59 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.4 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 31 Jan 2008 00:25:59 -0000 Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at sunsite.dk does not designate permitted sender hosts) Received: (qmail 30941 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2008 00:25:53 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 31 Jan 2008 00:25:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 11997 invoked by alias); 31 Jan 2008 00:25:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 24500 Received: (qmail 11980 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2008 00:25:48 -0000 Received: from bifrost.dotsrc.org (130.225.254.106) by sunsite.dk with SMTP; 31 Jan 2008 00:25:48 -0000 Received: from dot.blorf.net (dsl-74-220-69-132.cruzio.com [74.220.69.132]) by bifrost.dotsrc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39C4680482A0 for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 01:25:43 +0100 (CET) Received: by dot.blorf.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DE4E678DE; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:25:41 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:25:41 -0800 From: Wayne Davison To: Peter Stephenson Cc: Zsh Subject: Re: 4.3.4-dev-8 Message-ID: <20080131002541.GD11926@blorf.net> References: <32478.1201607012@csr.com> <20080129174700.GA25957@scowler.net> <200801291750.m0THoJTh006591@news01.csr.com> <20080129230135.GC10504@blorf.net> <20080130024201.GB17147@prunille.vinc17.org> <200801300954.m0U9smQ6004131@news01.csr.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200801300954.m0U9smQ6004131@news01.csr.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.91.2/5619/Wed Jan 30 22:55:02 2008 on bifrost X-Virus-Status: Clean On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 09:54:48AM +0000, Peter Stephenson wrote: > There aren't many of that list that *definitely* shouldn't be > executable. OK, they're all executable again. If there are some you don't want executable, let me know (or fill out a suppor request). ..wayne..