From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20527 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2008 09:55:45 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.4 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 18 Feb 2008 09:55:45 -0000 Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at sunsite.dk does not designate permitted sender hosts) Received: (qmail 35727 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2008 09:55:39 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 18 Feb 2008 09:55:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 11827 invoked by alias); 18 Feb 2008 09:55:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 24569 Received: (qmail 11813 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2008 09:55:35 -0000 Received: from bifrost.dotsrc.org (130.225.254.106) by sunsite.dk with SMTP; 18 Feb 2008 09:55:35 -0000 Received: from cluster-g.mailcontrol.com (cluster-g.mailcontrol.com [85.115.41.190]) by bifrost.dotsrc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E86D8026E0B for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 10:55:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from cameurexb01.EUROPE.ROOT.PRI ([62.189.241.200]) by rly15g.srv.mailcontrol.com (MailControl) with ESMTP id m1I9scOS006633 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 09:55:24 GMT Received: from news01.csr.com ([10.103.143.38]) by cameurexb01.EUROPE.ROOT.PRI with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 18 Feb 2008 09:55:12 +0000 Received: from news01.csr.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by news01.csr.com (8.14.2/8.13.4) with ESMTP id m1I9tCxY002336 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 09:55:12 GMT Received: from csr.com (pws@localhost) by news01.csr.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) with ESMTP id m1I9tCEm002333 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 09:55:12 GMT Message-Id: <200802180955.m1I9tCEm002333@news01.csr.com> X-Authentication-Warning: news01.csr.com: pws owned process doing -bs To: "Zsh Hackers' List" Subject: Re: read -s doesn't work with -t? In-reply-to: <080217181655.ZM10187@torch.brasslantern.com> References: <237967ef0802151327q1c6d3a19oa67a977b82c52f67@mail.gmail.com> <080215191216.ZM29994@torch.brasslantern.com> <237967ef0802152333g7f759674r806f61f9f76f86f2@mail.gmail.com> <237967ef0802152350i1fec3369oba9268400a209b2e@mail.gmail.com> <080216093755.ZM17001@torch.brasslantern.com> <20080217172225.1d8a8e4e@pws-pc> <080217181655.ZM10187@torch.brasslantern.com> Comments: In-reply-to Bart Schaefer message dated "Sun, 17 Feb 2008 18:16:55 -0800." Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 09:55:12 +0000 From: Peter Stephenson X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Feb 2008 09:55:12.0835 (UTC) FILETIME=[5ACCE930:01C87214] X-Scanned-By: MailControl A-08-00-04 (www.mailcontrol.com) on 10.71.0.125 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.91.2/5867/Mon Feb 18 08:12:11 2008 on bifrost X-Virus-Status: Clean Bart Schaefer wrote: > Does it even make sense to use -d and -k at the same time? No, I can't think of a good use for this (that is, good enough to make the code yet more complicated). It's easy enough to loop around read -k anyway. -- Peter Stephenson Software Engineer CSR PLC, Churchill House, Cambridge Business Park, Cowley Road Cambridge, CB4 0WZ, UK Tel: +44 (0)1223 692070