From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-24629-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.dk>
Received: (qmail 28889 invoked from network); 29 Feb 2008 02:07:48 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	version=3.2.4
Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 29 Feb 2008 02:07:48 -0000
Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at sunsite.dk does not designate permitted sender hosts)
Received: (qmail 33971 invoked from network); 29 Feb 2008 02:07:45 -0000
Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90)
  by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 29 Feb 2008 02:07:45 -0000
Received: (qmail 20043 invoked by alias); 29 Feb 2008 02:07:42 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 24629
Received: (qmail 20028 invoked from network); 29 Feb 2008 02:07:41 -0000
Received: from bifrost.dotsrc.org (130.225.254.106)
  by sunsite.dk with SMTP; 29 Feb 2008 02:07:41 -0000
Received: from acolyte.scowler.net (acolyte.scowler.net [216.254.112.45])
	by bifrost.dotsrc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B65C18026E0B
	for <zsh-workers@sunsite.dk>; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 03:07:38 +0100 (CET)
Received: by acolyte.scowler.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id DD7745C1A4; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 21:07:34 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 21:07:34 -0500
From: Clint Adams <clint@zsh.org>
To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk
Subject: Re: Bug#468386: zsh-beta: Slow command completion
Message-ID: <20080229020734.GA11155@scowler.net>
Mail-Followup-To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk
References: <87zltldnde.fsf@elegiac.orebokech.com> <20080228172715.GA12451@scowler.net> <080228095414.ZM15685@torch.brasslantern.com> <200802281754.m1SHsSf1021072@news01.csr.com> <20080228182402.GA24702@scowler.net> <080228171120.ZM16163@torch.brasslantern.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <080228171120.ZM16163@torch.brasslantern.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14)
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.91.2/6033/Fri Feb 29 01:48:11 2008 on bifrost
X-Virus-Status: Clean

On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 05:11:20PM -0800, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> Actually, the "verbose" style is just a boolean now, isn't it?  It
> could instead become a string style that describes various levels
> of verbosity.  Instead of "extra-verbose" with a value of "yes", the
> "verbose" style would have a value of "extra".

No objection from me.