From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16356 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2008 19:29:05 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.4 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 1 Mar 2008 19:29:05 -0000 Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at sunsite.dk does not designate permitted sender hosts) Received: (qmail 89899 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2008 19:29:02 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 1 Mar 2008 19:29:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 22079 invoked by alias); 1 Mar 2008 19:28:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 24649 Received: (qmail 22061 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2008 19:28:58 -0000 Received: from bifrost.dotsrc.org (130.225.254.106) by sunsite.dk with SMTP; 1 Mar 2008 19:28:58 -0000 Received: from acolyte.scowler.net (acolyte.scowler.net [216.254.112.45]) by bifrost.dotsrc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F39D38028C4C for ; Sat, 1 Mar 2008 20:28:54 +0100 (CET) Received: by acolyte.scowler.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 25E455C1A4; Sat, 1 Mar 2008 14:28:50 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2008 14:28:51 -0500 From: Clint Adams To: "Matthias B." Cc: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: Making built-in completion recognize : as word boundary Message-ID: <20080301192851.GA7672@scowler.net> Mail-Followup-To: "Matthias B." , zsh-workers@sunsite.dk References: <20080229221711.7729241b@buddha> <31312.1204331822@thecus> <20080301141747.320b246f@buddha> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080301141747.320b246f@buddha> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.91.2/6066/Sat Mar 1 19:21:53 2008 on bifrost X-Virus-Status: Clean On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 02:17:47PM +0100, Matthias B. wrote: > Yes. The shell function based completion is slow (ever tried it on a > 500MHz machine? That's what I'm writing this message on.) and more I used it religiously on a 440MHz machine until last year.