From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-24778-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.dk>
Received: (qmail 21864 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2008 16:17:01 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	version=3.2.4
Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 29 Mar 2008 16:17:01 -0000
Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at sunsite.dk does not designate permitted sender hosts)
Received: (qmail 11964 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2008 16:16:53 -0000
Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90)
  by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 29 Mar 2008 16:16:53 -0000
Received: (qmail 2818 invoked by alias); 29 Mar 2008 16:16:48 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 24778
Received: (qmail 2801 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2008 16:16:47 -0000
Received: from bifrost.dotsrc.org (130.225.254.106)
  by sunsite.dk with SMTP; 29 Mar 2008 16:16:47 -0000
Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.185])
	by bifrost.dotsrc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 040AB82CD273
	for <zsh-workers@sunsite.dk>; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 17:16:41 +0100 (CET)
Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id d21so316548nfb.11
        for <zsh-workers@sunsite.dk>; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 09:16:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:user-agent;
        bh=JJ4A6xIE7TPNAZVYobOEXocBuQHJhrJPanEbrhTrTYo=;
        b=izWL5TLdlmGNUjz6dq0BPUf8OMFnSR+2cpzcL8WcUjX/qeJxlzzY7YYtIOjcAzjpv64q6rBS/yprbM2Q1piGYs90IASbN9Dl5VCNsJuuF3TeWPFxN1WbVRrFKt2m6zwvj+KPyhfPwQ0gx3W0GGCOP6RC2LUKKguzUGWk5AcBI9Q=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:user-agent;
        b=csAFsoXj4XZ+SnfOq+Ym2ZImk8JFAUty5v3SjzAYwD7h67Sr2i1ugPFpQblUtEikBImG/TYOEBwJJJt6voS+fpZY84MqQ+jA/UPmI4dsL10hbqndBaBqkyIChwuccJRos9KVNgi6Q1m1zigy7j/6OWWGaFc30FsrzUhuk+aCBqQ=
Received: by 10.78.200.20 with SMTP id x20mr13882980huf.55.1206807400932;
        Sat, 29 Mar 2008 09:16:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ( [90.17.53.201])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e10sm5320542muf.10.2008.03.29.09.16.37
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Sat, 29 Mar 2008 09:16:38 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 17:18:24 +0100
From: Anthony Charles <antho.charles@gmail.com>
To: zsh-workers <zsh-workers@sunsite.dk>
Subject: #c flag wrong behaviour
Message-ID: <20080329161300.GA19193@okita>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14)
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.91.2/6464/Sat Mar 29 15:49:50 2008 on bifrost
X-Virus-Status: Clean

Hi,

I think there is a problem with the new #c flag:

zsh -f
Saito% setopt extendedglob
Saito% touch test.{zsh,ksh,bash}
Saito% print *.?(#c1)sh
test.ksh test.zsh
Saito% print *.?(#c2)sh
test.bash
Saito% print *.?(#c1,2)sh 
test.bash
Saito% print *.?(#c1,)sh    
zsh: no matches found: *.?(#c1,)sh
Saito% print *.?(#c1,)
test.bash test.ksh test.zsh
Saito%

It seems that #c flag is too greedy. Am I wrong?

-- 
Anthony CHARLES