From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26920 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2008 02:31:42 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.4 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 19 Apr 2008 02:31:42 -0000 Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at sunsite.dk does not designate permitted sender hosts) Received: (qmail 74301 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2008 02:31:37 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 19 Apr 2008 02:31:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 146 invoked by alias); 19 Apr 2008 02:31:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 24846 Received: (qmail 130 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2008 02:31:34 -0000 Received: from bifrost.dotsrc.org (130.225.254.106) by sunsite.dk with SMTP; 19 Apr 2008 02:31:34 -0000 Received: from dot.blorf.net (dsl-74-220-69-132.cruzio.com [74.220.69.132]) by bifrost.dotsrc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE1C7808A379 for ; Sat, 19 Apr 2008 04:31:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dot.blorf.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id AE3DF1EEB; Fri, 18 Apr 2008 19:31:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 19:31:55 -0700 From: Wayne Davison To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: [PATCH] history locking with fcntl Message-ID: <20080419023155.GB23964@blorf.net> References: <20080415153120.GE1223@prunille.vinc17.org> <20080417162307.GB22594@blorf.net> <20080418005959.GB1067@prunille.vinc17.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080418005959.GB1067@prunille.vinc17.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15+20070412 (2007-04-11) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.91.2/6834/Fri Apr 18 23:09:50 2008 on bifrost X-Virus-Status: Clean On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 02:59:59AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > If I do not set the option (which is equivalent to not using the patch), > then I get immediate history corruption when using two machines (well, > at least 64-bit ones), 100% reproducible. Cool. Then it will be easy for you to get the real error now that that "bad file descriptor" bug is fixed. I'm curious why the old code is failing. > I'll try it. Much appreciated. ..wayne..