From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6002 invoked from network); 19 May 2008 11:46:01 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.4 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 19 May 2008 11:46:01 -0000 Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at sunsite.dk does not designate permitted sender hosts) Received: (qmail 24699 invoked from network); 19 May 2008 11:45:54 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 19 May 2008 11:45:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 21543 invoked by alias); 19 May 2008 11:45:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 25072 Received: (qmail 21527 invoked from network); 19 May 2008 11:45:50 -0000 Received: from bifrost.dotsrc.org (130.225.254.106) by sunsite.dk with SMTP; 19 May 2008 11:45:50 -0000 Received: from cluster-g.mailcontrol.com (cluster-g.mailcontrol.com [85.115.41.190]) by bifrost.dotsrc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E7E880589A4 for ; Mon, 19 May 2008 13:45:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from cameurexb01.EUROPE.ROOT.PRI ([62.189.241.200]) by rly16g.srv.mailcontrol.com (MailControl) with ESMTP id m4JBbqUe006889 for ; Mon, 19 May 2008 12:45:08 +0100 Received: from news01.csr.com ([10.103.143.38]) by cameurexb01.EUROPE.ROOT.PRI with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 19 May 2008 12:42:19 +0100 Received: from news01.csr.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by news01.csr.com (8.14.2/8.13.4) with ESMTP id m4JBgJnm004151 for ; Mon, 19 May 2008 12:42:19 +0100 Received: from csr.com (pws@localhost) by news01.csr.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) with ESMTP id m4JBgJka004148 for ; Mon, 19 May 2008 12:42:19 +0100 Message-Id: <200805191142.m4JBgJka004148@news01.csr.com> X-Authentication-Warning: news01.csr.com: pws owned process doing -bs To: Zsh hackers list Subject: Re: Memory errors with Fedora 9 x86_64 In-reply-to: <20080519074129.GA90276@redoubt.spodhuis.org> References: <21272.1211041618@pws-pc> <20080519074129.GA90276@redoubt.spodhuis.org> Comments: In-reply-to Phil Pennock message dated "Mon, 19 May 2008 00:41:29 -0700." Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 12:42:19 +0100 From: Peter Stephenson X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 May 2008 11:42:19.0615 (UTC) FILETIME=[650CF6F0:01C8B9A5] X-Scanned-By: MailControl A-08-50-03 (www.mailcontrol.com) on 10.71.0.126 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.91.2/7153/Mon May 19 02:25:02 2008 on bifrost X-Virus-Status: Clean Phil Pennock wrote: > I get one solidly repeatable test failure, working from a fresh CVS > checkout; including it below instead of starting a new thread, in case > it's a sign that I'm not running the tests correctly (I've *cough* never > run them before). That was a typo that I've fixed. > I also, on one iteration of the tests against zsh > built with gcc4 got the second error below; I haven't dug into it, but > it's sleep-based, is it known to be load-sensitive? Yes, tests like this are definitely problematic and could do with a rethink. -- Peter Stephenson Software Engineer CSR PLC, Churchill House, Cambridge Business Park, Cowley Road Cambridge, CB4 0WZ, UK Tel: +44 (0)1223 692070