From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9495 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2009 21:43:54 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 10 Jan 2009 21:43:54 -0000 Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at sunsite.dk does not designate permitted sender hosts) Received: (qmail 95151 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2009 21:43:50 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 10 Jan 2009 21:43:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 18362 invoked by alias); 10 Jan 2009 21:43:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 26281 Received: (qmail 18344 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2009 21:43:45 -0000 Received: from bifrost.dotsrc.org (130.225.254.106) by sunsite.dk with SMTP; 10 Jan 2009 21:43:45 -0000 Received: from mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com [81.103.221.48]) by bifrost.dotsrc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5E38802720C for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 22:43:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vM.7.08.04.00 201-2186-134-20080326) with ESMTP id <20090110214341.XIHC4080.mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com> for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 21:43:41 +0000 Received: from pws-pc ([81.107.45.176]) by aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vG.2.02.00.01 201-2161-120-102-20060912) with ESMTP id <20090110214341.EOZC2093.aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@pws-pc> for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 21:43:41 +0000 Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 21:43:38 +0000 From: Peter Stephenson To: "Zsh Hackers' List" Subject: Re: Getting the CVS revision of Zsh Message-ID: <20090110214338.013cc425@pws-pc> In-Reply-To: <2d460de70901091433q7bac758dg3153c1efa687347e@mail.gmail.com> References: <2d460de70901090301h6b309a7cm19c5ebfec989ff2c@mail.gmail.com> <200901091121.n09BLVvZ006382@news01.csr.com> <2d460de70901090348t3ea9e25fi29a7165ee42ae5e5@mail.gmail.com> <200901091158.n09BwPii006839@news01.csr.com> <2d460de70901090441i7ef1795bs42ed98fe0f33c9ba@mail.gmail.com> <200901091258.n09CwS7T007471@news01.csr.com> <2d460de70901090507i7c3179e4u1e2def459f214566@mail.gmail.com> <20090109201333.5dcc8fdb@pws-pc> <2d460de70901091433q7bac758dg3153c1efa687347e@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.6.1 (GTK+ 2.14.5; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=2o9eVglb3IMA:10 a=NLZqzBF-AAAA:8 a=e9lxoIUTiCZefBAGdBMA:9 a=bDEM4FFdluzwTPbo132cwUM2yFAA:4 a=LY0hPdMaydYA:10 a=ZfyWQJYG1gAA:10 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.92.1/8849/Sat Jan 10 05:18:40 2009 on bifrost X-Virus-Status: Clean On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 23:33:55 +0100 "Richard Hartmann" wrote: > > +hence most users should not use it and should instead rely on > > +tt($ZSH_VERSION). > > "should rely on tt($ZSH_VERSION), instead." sounds better to > me, but keep in mind i am not a native speaker. Since you're interested: "should instead" is slightly more formal phrasing, although from the point of view of sense there's nothing much in it. The comma before an adverb would be non-standard, but the same comment applies. The tendency among native speakers nowadays appears to be to underuse commas---none of these things are quite as absolute as people have sometimes liked to claim, although nowadays people sometimes go to the opposite extreme. In summary [comma] brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr. -- Peter Stephenson Web page now at http://homepage.ntlworld.com/p.w.stephenson/