From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-26682-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.dk>
Received: (qmail 15649 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2009 18:31:16 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	version=3.2.5
Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 3 Mar 2009 18:31:16 -0000
Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at sunsite.dk does not designate permitted sender hosts)
Received: (qmail 88601 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2009 18:31:11 -0000
Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90)
  by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 3 Mar 2009 18:31:11 -0000
Received: (qmail 14495 invoked by alias); 3 Mar 2009 18:31:06 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 26682
Received: (qmail 14479 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2009 18:31:06 -0000
Received: from bifrost.dotsrc.org (130.225.254.106)
  by sunsite.dk with SMTP; 3 Mar 2009 18:31:06 -0000
Received: from cluster-d.mailcontrol.com (cluster-d.mailcontrol.com [85.115.60.190])
	by bifrost.dotsrc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 732978058F82
	for <zsh-workers@sunsite.dk>; Tue,  3 Mar 2009 19:31:03 +0100 (CET)
Received: from cameurexb01.EUROPE.ROOT.PRI ([193.128.72.68])
	by rly49d.srv.mailcontrol.com (MailControl) with ESMTP id n23IV1xj018589
	for <zsh-workers@sunsite.dk>; Tue, 3 Mar 2009 18:31:01 GMT
Received: from news01.csr.com ([10.103.143.38]) by cameurexb01.EUROPE.ROOT.PRI with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);
	 Tue, 3 Mar 2009 18:31:01 +0000
Received: from news01.csr.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by news01.csr.com (8.14.2/8.13.4) with ESMTP id n23IV1lc028015
	for <zsh-workers@sunsite.dk>; Tue, 3 Mar 2009 18:31:01 GMT
Received: from csr.com (pws@localhost)
	by news01.csr.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) with ESMTP id n23IV0QM028011
	for <zsh-workers@sunsite.dk>; Tue, 3 Mar 2009 18:31:01 GMT
Message-Id: <200903031831.n23IV0QM028011@news01.csr.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: news01.csr.com: pws owned process doing -bs
To: Zsh hackers list <zsh-workers@sunsite.dk>
Subject: Re: PATCH: caps strings
In-reply-to: <237967ef0903031021yf6632adhd399c06289ff6ddc@mail.gmail.com>
References: <27480.1236102218@csr.com> <237967ef0903030955l1bbe4224p9d3f4a2bf1d04c77@mail.gmail.com> <20090303181056.3ec33006@news01> <237967ef0903031021yf6632adhd399c06289ff6ddc@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@gmail.com>
   message dated "Tue, 03 Mar 2009 19:21:44 +0100."
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 18:31:00 +0000
From: Peter Stephenson <pws@csr.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Mar 2009 18:31:01.0109 (UTC) FILETIME=[33F80250:01C99C2E]
X-Scanned-By: MailControl A_08_51_00 (www.mailcontrol.com) on 10.68.0.159
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.92.1/9065/Tue Mar  3 11:43:41 2009 on bifrost
X-Virus-Status: Clean

Mikael Magnusson wrote:
> Does dupstring somehow allocate from the stack?

Yes.

> Should I use it
> instead of re-metafy()ing in attr.c too, or maybe it doesn't really
> matter which you do?

It's not crucial; dupstring() is probably slightly neater.

pws