From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9395 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2009 14:14:11 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 Received: from new-brage.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.254.104) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 9 Jul 2009 14:14:11 -0000 Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at sunsite.dk does not designate permitted sender hosts) Received: (qmail 76129 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2009 14:14:04 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 9 Jul 2009 14:14:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 27523 invoked by alias); 9 Jul 2009 14:13:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 27105 Received: (qmail 27502 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2009 14:13:56 -0000 Received: from bifrost.dotsrc.org (130.225.254.106) by sunsite.dk with SMTP; 9 Jul 2009 14:13:56 -0000 Received: from cluster-d.mailcontrol.com (cluster-d.mailcontrol.com [85.115.60.190]) by bifrost.dotsrc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48C6B80307FA for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 16:13:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from cameurexb01.EUROPE.ROOT.PRI ([193.128.72.68]) by rly39d.srv.mailcontrol.com (MailControl) with ESMTP id n69EDWlx019762 for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 15:13:38 +0100 Received: from news01.csr.com ([10.99.50.25]) by cameurexb01.EUROPE.ROOT.PRI with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 9 Jul 2009 15:13:31 +0100 Received: from news01.csr.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by news01.csr.com (8.14.2/8.13.4) with ESMTP id n69EDV6t012977 for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 15:13:31 +0100 Received: from csr.com (pws@localhost) by news01.csr.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) with ESMTP id n69EDVYV012974 for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 15:13:31 +0100 Message-Id: <200907091413.n69EDVYV012974@news01.csr.com> X-Authentication-Warning: news01.csr.com: pws owned process doing -bs To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: non-interactive set -m In-reply-to: References: <200907080858.n688wXfc030608@news01.csr.com> <200907081349.n68DneSv001850@news01.csr.com> Comments: In-reply-to Eric Blake message dated "Thu, 09 Jul 2009 14:03:57 -0000." Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 15:13:31 +0100 From: Peter Stephenson X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Jul 2009 14:13:31.0996 (UTC) FILETIME=[707471C0:01CA009F] X-Scanned-By: MailControl A-09-20-00 (www.mailcontrol.com) on 10.68.0.149 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.94.2/9551/Thu Jul 9 15:22:08 2009 on bifrost X-Virus-Status: Clean Eric Blake wrote: > Peter Stephenson csr.com> writes: > > > > POSIX requires that 'set -m'/'set -o monitor' be switchable on the fly > > > > You're right---there's another test of the same kind there (i.e. that > > we're interactive). This removes it. Let me know if you run up against > > more, or if there's some hidden interaction with the > > interactive/non-interactive mode (I wouldn't bet against it). > > I'd love to test this. However, I'm behind a firewall, and can't access CVS. > > Is there a snapshot available? > http://zsh.sourceforge.net/zsh-4.3-daily-snapshot.tar.bz2 appears to be a dea > d > link. Or are there any plans for moving to a newer VCS, such as git, which > makes http access much easier? There's an almost up-to-date git mirror available; see http://www.zsh.org/mla/workers/2009/msg00516.html -- Peter Stephenson Software Engineer CSR PLC, Churchill House, Cambridge Business Park, Cowley Road Cambridge, CB4 0WZ, UK Tel: +44 (0)1223 692070