From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1515 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2009 09:26:59 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 Received: from new-brage.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.254.104) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 10 Sep 2009 09:26:59 -0000 Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at sunsite.dk does not designate permitted sender hosts) Received: (qmail 97645 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2009 09:26:45 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 10 Sep 2009 09:26:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 14596 invoked by alias); 10 Sep 2009 09:26:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 27257 Received: (qmail 14564 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2009 09:26:34 -0000 Received: from bifrost.dotsrc.org (130.225.254.106) by sunsite.dk with SMTP; 10 Sep 2009 09:26:34 -0000 Received: from cluster-d.mailcontrol.com (cluster-d.mailcontrol.com [85.115.60.190]) by bifrost.dotsrc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DAEF8026E39 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:26:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from cameurexb01.EUROPE.ROOT.PRI ([193.128.72.68]) by rly10d.srv.mailcontrol.com (MailControl) with ESMTP id n8A9QG60012151 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 10:26:17 +0100 Received: from news01.csr.com ([10.99.50.25]) by cameurexb01.EUROPE.ROOT.PRI with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 10 Sep 2009 10:26:15 +0100 Received: from news01.csr.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by news01.csr.com (8.14.2/8.13.4) with ESMTP id n8A9QFsx025640 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 10:26:15 +0100 Received: from csr.com (pws@localhost) by news01.csr.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) with ESMTP id n8A9QFTh025636 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 10:26:15 +0100 Message-Id: <200909100926.n8A9QFTh025636@news01.csr.com> X-Authentication-Warning: news01.csr.com: pws owned process doing -bs To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: completion bug: treats substitution of unset parameter as empty string In-reply-to: References: <19056.37899.24683.999959@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Comments: In-reply-to Greg Klanderman message dated "Wed, 09 Sep 2009 00:10:44 -0400." Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 10:26:15 +0100 From: Peter Stephenson X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Sep 2009 09:26:15.0944 (UTC) FILETIME=[BEFDE080:01CA31F8] Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MailControl A-06-00-00 (www.mailcontrol.com) on 10.68.0.120 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.94.2/9791/Thu Sep 10 03:03:33 2009 on bifrost X-Virus-Status: Clean Greg Klanderman wrote: > How exactly is the default set of shell options arrived at for the > evaluation of completion functions? My own setopts do not seem to > effect the completion functions.. how is that? See _comp_options and _comp_setup in compinit and the use of _comp_setup in _main_complete. -- Peter Stephenson Software Engineer Tel: +44 (0)1223 692070 Cambridge Silicon Radio Limited Churchill House, Cambridge Business Park, Cowley Road, Cambridge, CB4 0WZ, UK Member of the CSR plc group of companies. CSR plc registered in England and Wales, registered number 4187346, registered office Churchill House, Cambridge Business Park, Cowley Road, Cambridge, CB4 0WZ, United Kingdom