From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17225 invoked by alias); 5 Dec 2009 20:11:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 27469 Received: (qmail 28919 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2009 20:11:43 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at ntlworld.com designates 81.103.221.48 as permitted sender) Message-Id: <200912052011.nB5KBaM9003194@pws-pc.ntlworld.com> From: Peter Stephenson To: zsh workers Subject: Re: Add completion suffix highlighting In-Reply-To: Message from Mikael Magnusson of "Sat, 05 Dec 2009 20:49:37 +0100." <237967ef0912051149v169754b4q26be5e6ce60952dd@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 20:11:36 +0000 X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=W3tOLUehizD4qj6VhtReFuw5MKb8d+XqjIxlDsIazEA= c=1 sm=0 a=NLZqzBF-AAAA:8 a=pd6IN98gnS4cpbG3lw4A:9 a=Xfi28cvtvoBi_I9QGgmblsE10sAA:4 a=_dQi-Dcv4p4A:10 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 Mikael Magnusson wrote: > Is there any completion that actually uses > the multiple suffix feature? I don't think so. In practice in such a case it's generally a seperation character. -- Peter Stephenson Web page now at http://homepage.ntlworld.com/p.w.stephenson/