From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-27809-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 9766 invoked by alias); 18 Mar 2010 20:09:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 27809
Received: (qmail 11239 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2010 20:09:30 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.2.5
Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at ruderich.org designates 78.46.69.5 as permitted sender)
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 21:10:26 +0100
From: Simon Ruderich <simon@ruderich.org>
To: zsh-workers@zsh.org
Subject: Re: Update to _files in 27780 breaks chmod completion
Message-ID: <20100318201026.GA20469@ruderich.org>
References: <20100318163028.GA9043@ruderich.org>
 <201003181704.o2IH4Ixw016423@news01.csr.com>
 <20100318174942.GA1373@ruderich.org>
 <201003181759.o2IHx81I017112@news01.csr.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=_zucker.schokokeks.org-5829-1268942963-0001-2"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <201003181759.o2IHx81I017112@news01.csr.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20-dev (2010-03-09)

--=_zucker.schokokeks.org-5829-1268942963-0001-2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 05:59:08PM +0000, Peter Stephenson wrote:
> Generally there's never any guarantee that functions with one
> distribution will work with another, since in all "production"
> installations this isn't an issue as $fpath is set appropriately.
>
> However, I think the following should work in both versions and I'd be
> interested to hear about it going wrong...  In fact I'm not sure why the
> code uses ":gs" instead off "//" which is a more obvious operator at
> this point.  Possibly the latter used to be flakey.

Thank you very much, this works perfectly.

Simon
--=20
+ privacy is necessary
+ using gnupg http://gnupg.org
+ public key id: 0x92FEFDB7E44C32F9

--=_zucker.schokokeks.org-5829-1268942963-0001-2
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
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=yaCt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=_zucker.schokokeks.org-5829-1268942963-0001-2--