From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-27832-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 968 invoked by alias); 26 Mar 2010 01:19:48 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 27832
Received: (qmail 25842 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2010 01:19:37 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at spodhuis.org does not designate permitted sender hosts)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=spodhuis.org; s=d200912;
	h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=cgr3GAnQKn4pbTiimyiujpP41+y4eGJ6Fxz0DUAzuNc=;
	b=Qpyx0cncslloXwqkKkpAkwHF1DcXJ9VVlwU/x2HSztTMdf5TdU8qMh562EGquVK0geI2MOoRy8soj+H5MH0hSZiI2v5eQcMeZO12UtUsyhk+GKY94oriFaET1ZWO7gCstPh5iFHV4f60mtHYwB8HV9t81ApHXTeZ/pcylt7wecI=;
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:02:59 -0700
From: Phil Pennock <zsh-workers+phil.pennock@spodhuis.org>
To: Peter Stephenson <p.w.stephenson@ntlworld.com>
Cc: Zsh hackers list <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: count glyphs in multibyte strings
Message-ID: <20100326010259.GA68432@redoubt.spodhuis.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Peter Stephenson <p.w.stephenson@ntlworld.com>,
	Zsh hackers list <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
References: <22950.1269552903@pws-pc>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <22950.1269552903@pws-pc>

On 2010-03-25 at 21:35 +0000, Peter Stephenson wrote:
> I noticed we were missing this capability; not sure how useful it is in
> practice, but it was straightforward to add.
> 
> You might want to check my terminology and assumptions about the way
> Unicode works aren't gibberish.

What about -1 being returned from wcwidth() for non-printable
characters?  Looks like this is an existing issue.

-Phil