From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4108 invoked by alias); 29 Jul 2010 20:49:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 28107 Received: (qmail 15371 invoked from network); 29 Jul 2010 20:49:04 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at sdf.lonestar.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) From: Paul Ackersviller Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 20:37:50 +0000 To: Dave Yost Cc: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: RFE: DIR_PUSHD Message-ID: <20100729203749.GA21812@sverige> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Yost , zsh-workers@zsh.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2010-03-22) On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 12:25:23PM -0700, Dave Yost wrote: > AUTO_CD is nice, but I find it would usually be better if > "executing" a directory would instead pushd to that directory. > > The obvious name for such an option would be AUTO_PUSHD, but that > name is already in use for something else. Perhaps I'm missing something, but does AUTO_PUSHD in conjunction with AUTO_CD not already do what you want? That's what I always set, and I'm a happy pushd-er.