From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24770 invoked by alias); 5 Jan 2011 18:52:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 28570 Received: (qmail 4592 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2011 18:52:01 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at rzhou.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 13:33:30 -0500 From: Ricky Zhou To: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix buffer overflow in mindist. Message-ID: <20110105183330.GC2621@alpha.rzhou.org> Mail-Followup-To: zsh-workers@zsh.org References: <20101227120023.GA27174@alpha.rzhou.org> <20110105172029.0b2e1de6@pws-pc.ntlworld.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NU0Ex4SbNnrxsi6C" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110105172029.0b2e1de6@pws-pc.ntlworld.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) --NU0Ex4SbNnrxsi6C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2011-01-05 05:20:29 PM, Peter Stephenson wrote: > > (reported at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3D591377) >=20 > Reports there are no use to us and we are emphatically *not* in the > position to look at more sources of information, is anyone passing them > on? I know, just thought I'd give credit to original reporter with the link. In this case, I was passing on report by way of the patch - normally, the package maintainers who get those bugs would pass them on to zsh developers. > Thanks, we might as well fix the problem robustly since buf is only > needed locally. (Robustly except for the fact the shell crashes > horribly if it runs out of memory, but there's no hope of fixing that.) Looks good, thanks! Thanks, Ricky --NU0Ex4SbNnrxsi6C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJNJLl6AAoJEAo9eiREaTF2ADMP/j5/7d5XWLIiO2j4pMo+SVcf wOkr+0nZCipnzOeC/3jYKCXKtdVp2C2AhK/P62HKk9oKSpuZvQHqxZbUnUa/QPpX lKF7SnUEbnoMSiI5o6ECeYw3jpMKx/94/Td11gyCsskWp5j/fCCTG1Ngtn4lfveF ymEmNpsmThmcVO/u7bvrhGv019I7wGGvwplqtlGmP2m6QOjue+JlMrStXZCFxvQu qP3Ct+eA/LV5nTCHba/Y8/RBCiB0R/IOSKlYzck9Yk9SEWK3jUfKAIckzZTbgV7e mu6LEbyTsaYCC4GSG2ubmkaY+oKjMcXUVkW+eggMzKlB7CRVFoEnQuv499R2MuIr 2xo2A/CBiOiVnzdn+vlXtmNHPWyCzmwP3TdvQJJscNZES+OED2YnOUq44Pe2YKOd R/GBjscviWj86oqusPbiETbNORnehL09pf4vDO/JAyWLmY+6OK8Xf5/Y6Do9xs8n jfsLJJ1Sc4EAaAW8gKZORY267NqCmp1bXltqIr1eFRt28xSTh8cSIpthfSpRbo1I yHyzDnXplhqHMFKmCCxM7e/ObbIaO6qqx1ALrjw0mmbePIjOvz2lJwtkwNso3HA/ ItwiSHhbywcGhcoTKVj7wciIJcWwT4RIpzx/twPBLFYlDtoKjch3d9ZFiP4A+utF 3flCHZtsy1qC+7kXynfe =41fj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --NU0Ex4SbNnrxsi6C--