From: "Alexey I. Froloff" <raorn@altlinux.org>
To: zsh-workers@zsh.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Completion/Unix/Commands/_ri: updated for Ruby 1.9.2
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 03:30:14 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110106003014.GA11154@altlinux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.01.1101051618090.2792@hp>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1368 bytes --]
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 04:27:35PM -0500, Benjamin R. Haskell wrote:
> Maybe it makes sense, but it seems weird that the tests are conditioned
> on running Ruby scripts rather than looking at `ri --version`.
ri --version reports something weird. I don't know since when
things were changed, checking for modules that have been removed
or added seems to be fair enough.
Are you thinking there's too much (and too direct) ruby
invocations?
> And how does this fare against different Ruby implementations? Would
> JRuby 1.9.2 necessarily use the same 'ri' conventions as MRI Ruby 1.9.2?
Yes. Latest JRuby supports both 1.8 and 1.9 Ruby versions and
have copies of standard runtime libraries (both versions) which
includes RI.
> And more generally, since it's looking in directories that would only
> contain Ruby documentation, would it hurt to include both .yaml and .ri
> for versions that support .ri?
I thought about it, yes. Newer RI doesn't read .yaml
documentation. It wouldn't hurt, but it would complete something
that can't be shown.
This patch will un-break ri completion for latest stable MRI Ruby
version. I wrote this completion and I am responsible for that.
However, I am not satisfied with current implementation, I'm
working on it.
--
Regards, --
Sir Raorn. --- http://thousandsofhate.blogspot.com/
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-06 0:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-30 22:41 Alexey I. Froloff
2011-01-04 11:32 ` Alexey I. Froloff
2011-01-05 21:27 ` Benjamin R. Haskell
2011-01-06 0:30 ` Alexey I. Froloff [this message]
2011-01-06 6:07 ` Benjamin R. Haskell
2011-01-06 6:01 ` [PATCH] Completion/Unix/Commands/_ri: missed format change Benjamin R. Haskell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110106003014.GA11154@altlinux.org \
--to=raorn@altlinux.org \
--cc=zsh-workers@zsh.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/zsh/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).