From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7530 invoked by alias); 13 Feb 2011 18:20:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 28753 Received: (qmail 2250 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2011 18:20:52 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at ntlworld.com designates 81.103.221.58 as permitted sender) Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 17:54:29 +0000 From: Peter Stephenson To: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: Another _path_files bug? Message-ID: <20110213175429.1c95243a@pws-pc.ntlworld.com> In-Reply-To: <110212142222.ZM2525@torch.brasslantern.com> References: <110210084252.ZM30454@torch.brasslantern.com> <110210092820.ZM30702@torch.brasslantern.com> <20110211203935.4fa6af6a@pws-pc.ntlworld.com> <110212142222.ZM2525@torch.brasslantern.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.8 (GTK+ 2.22.0; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=R50lirqlHffDPPkwUlkuVa99MrvKdVWo//yz83qex8g= c=1 sm=0 a=Wv_pRUIl9nMA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=q2GGsy2AAAAA:8 a=NLZqzBF-AAAA:8 a=7pp6u_Jib3IDOe0QH0wA:9 a=2VhbwKjZVSGRKH4Fur1oL6zV5-AA:4 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=I6wTmPyJxzYA:10 a=_dQi-Dcv4p4A:10 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 14:22:22 -0800 Bart Schaefer wrote: > This works for the test cases I could think of applying, such as putting > a full path at the front and (separately) where the tail is ambiguous. I've committed it with some extra comments that are a bit vaguer than would be ideal. -- Peter Stephenson Web page now at http://homepage.ntlworld.com/p.w.stephenson/