From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7113 invoked by alias); 27 Apr 2011 01:59:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 29074 Received: (qmail 23445 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2011 01:59:30 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, FREEMAIL_FROM,NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Received-SPF: neutral (ns1.primenet.com.au: 128.2.11.95 is neither permitted nor denied by SPF record at _spf.google.com) Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 21:52:12 -0400 From: gi1242+zsh@gmail.com To: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: Slowness issue with git completion Message-ID: <20110427015212.GD10418@andrew.cmu.edu> Mail-Followup-To: gi1242+zsh@gmail.com, zsh-workers@zsh.org References: <87liyw7t0o.fsf@ft.bewatermyfriend.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-PMX-Version: 5.5.9.388399, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379, Antispam-Data: 2011.4.27.11818 X-SMTP-Spam-Clean: 33% ( RDNS_SUSP_FORGED_FROM 3.5, FORGED_FROM_GMAIL 0.1, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_1000_1099 0, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS 0, NO_REAL_NAME 0, RDNS_BROADBAND 0, RDNS_GENERIC_POOLED 0, RDNS_POOLED 0, RDNS_SUSP 0, RDNS_SUSP_GENERIC 0, RDNS_SUSP_SPECIFIC 0, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ 0, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT 0, __CD 0, __CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __FRAUD_WEBMAIL 0, __FRAUD_WEBMAIL_FROM 0, __FROM_GMAIL 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __PHISH_SPEAR_STRUCTURE_1 0, __RDNS_BROADBAND_5 0, __RDNS_POOLED_11 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __TO_NO_NAME 0, __URI_NO_MAILTO 0, __URI_NS , __USER_AGENT 0) X-SMTP-Spam-Score: 33% X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.60 on 128.2.11.95 On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 01:25:32AM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote: > Oh, if I say the current implementation is dead slow and unusable, you > find that offensive? Maybe you should understand that criticism to > code is not criticism to you. My 2 cents: I've not written the git code, and I seldom use it. So criticism to this code doesn't really affect me on any level. But I found your tone hostile, and your comments rude. Given that most people who work for zsh are volunteers, pissing them off might not be the best way to go about things. Perhaps you might want to take a look at http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html Specifically http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html#courtesy http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html#not_losing GI -- The 10 Commandments of DOS: 7. Know in thy heart that DOS shall always maintain backward compatibility to the holy 2.0 version, blindly ignoring opportunities to become compatible with things created in the latter half of this century. But you can still run WordStar 1.0