From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29629 invoked by alias); 5 May 2011 23:41:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 29161 Received: (qmail 23239 invoked from network); 5 May 2011 23:41:23 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at zsh.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 23:38:29 +0000 From: Clint Adams To: Felipe Contreras Cc: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: When can we make a compromise in Git completion? Message-ID: <20110505233829.GA27655@scru.org> References: <110505153721.ZM20011@torch.brasslantern.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 02:01:20AM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote: > Why would I even try if the result of this work is going to the trash? > First you tell me you would consider it for merging, then I will try > it, no point otherwise. I have dealt with projects where getting patches accepted is difficult and aggravating, where patches get rejected for ridiculous reasons like punctuation in commit logs, where submitters give up after a few attempts and then the fixes never make it into mainline. This project is not one of those. Provide a superior method and I'll be surprised if it gets rejected because someone is being pigheaded or territorial.