From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-29994-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 12252 invoked by alias); 10 Dec 2011 22:18:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 29994
Received: (qmail 19248 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2011 22:18:27 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RDNS_DYNAMIC,
	SPF_HELO_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2
Received-SPF: softfail (ns1.primenet.com.au: transitioning SPF record at lorien.comfychair.org does not designate 173.8.144.102 as permitted sender)
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 14:18:21 -0800
From: Danek Duvall <duvall@comfychair.org>
To: Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@gmail.com>
Cc: zsh-workers@zsh.org
Subject: Re: PATCH: Update _bind_addresses to work with new ifconfig output
 (and old).
Message-ID: <20111210221821.GE3736@lorien.comfychair.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Danek Duvall <duvall@comfychair.org>,
	Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@gmail.com>, zsh-workers@zsh.org
References: <1323545572-10775-1-git-send-email-mikachu@gmail.com>
 <20111210201454.GD3736@lorien.comfychair.org>
 <CAHYJk3TUQ83FkcMVw5Y4+wbpuo5BkRumAKPwHyH9PUBxBDOKGg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAHYJk3TUQ83FkcMVw5Y4+wbpuo5BkRumAKPwHyH9PUBxBDOKGg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2010-04-22)

On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 09:26:46PM +0100, Mikael Magnusson wrote:

> Thanks, I've updated the patch. Does it complete ipv6 addresses if you
> add 6(#c0,1) after the second inet instead?
> ${${${(M)${(f)"$(ifconfig -a)"}:#*inet*}##*inet6(#c0,1) (addr:)(#c0,1)}%% *}

Yes, but, as you saw, with the network prefix length, too.  Putting that
expression in ${...%/<->} seems to remove the length for me.

> But maybe if it's an inet6 it should also be surrounded by [], I'm not
> super familiar with ipv6 and what programs expect since I don't use it.

Yeah, I'm not positive what ssh expects here.  Looks like either

    [<address>]:<port>

or

    <address>/port

would work, which makes sense, as neither syntax is ambiguous.  But the ssh
on Solaris is forked from openssh, so I can't say how a pure openssh
implementation would be.

Danek