From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20781 invoked by alias); 12 Dec 2011 12:16:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 30007 Received: (qmail 6629 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2011 12:16:46 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at csr.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 12:16:20 +0000 From: Peter Stephenson To: zsh workers Subject: Re: the numeric argument, or the prefix argument Message-ID: <20111212121620.596c3eec@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Cambridge Silicon Radio X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.0; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.101.11.233] X-Scanned-By: MailControl 7.6.5 (www.mailcontrol.com) on 10.71.0.123 On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 22:40:36 +0100 Mikael Magnusson wrote: > On a few places in the manpage, reference is made to 'the prefix > argument', referring to the numeric argument. I don't see any obvious > place to mention that they're the same, so should we just change all > 'prefix' to 'numeric' instead? Fine by me. -- Peter Stephenson Software Engineer Tel: +44 (0)1223 692070 Cambridge Silicon Radio Limited Churchill House, Cambridge Business Park, Cowley Road, Cambridge, CB4 0WZ, UK Member of the CSR plc group of companies. CSR plc registered in England and Wales, registered number 4187346, registered office Churchill House, Cambridge Business Park, Cowley Road, Cambridge, CB4 0WZ, United Kingdom More information can be found at www.csr.com. Follow CSR on Twitter at http://twitter.com/CSR_PLC and read our blog at www.csr.com/blog