From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7854 invoked by alias); 21 Jan 2012 02:47:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 30116 Received: (qmail 17609 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2012 02:47:10 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at daniel.shahaf.name does not designate permitted sender hosts) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= daniel.shahaf.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh= OTU+Au5zWTdJgWJ0u82/T+/CIHE=; b=ZTOwe7q/DGuFY1F7FH3t/E/v9p/ndmmA 42DPmdEyvDRsx1GLc592Z0gt4gimo6JjDiTdUIcf9/8tbz6lSypuq0ol2hNlYMjI MZBT3CY87T2ql9moiBkxsQ6sxDqEiETFEBTgBfXsT/hXABiPvfmlGkPSYeK1BfdZ frUlW7vHOA0= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=smtpout; bh=OTU+Au5zWTdJgWJ0u82/T+/CIHE=; b=TmNVlEoxG9fV7YB2dldArS7reEJ2 cb3qfWZ6y2mQm/UvXBl/vLz3XquxrGzx/wqjMuLBhruWUcWtnWxzp32du3JFEK/4 YCXJ3xFYHpLut4GWtU1kps/IjblA0+8RNbsgB2SRDgoioaeW5FhVIn9oP4TZQKQ7 qYOn3RT53rDezKc= X-Sasl-enc: 77IHLH3iwhw4C33aZ8sV2ni8Rpa8WgkXldiTPhu0u2GGNGaRTtEr40ENCQIT6w 1327113609 Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 04:39:57 +0200 From: Daniel Shahaf To: Christian Neukirchen Cc: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: Obscure zsh history overflow with segfault Message-ID: <20120121023957.GA2643@daniel3.local> References: <87ty3q5ffx.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87ty3q5ffx.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Christian Neukirchen wrote on Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 20:42:10 +0100: > Any ideas? TBH, I don't even know what "r 100 asdfgh" should do, > it was a mistyping of "repeat 100 asdfgh". % which r r: shell built-in command % man zshall | grep -w r | grep -w fc r Same as fc -e -. % run-help fc | head -30 ... % Apparently, 'r 100 foo' should re-execute the portion of your history from event #100 to event 'foo'. Sounds like a bad idea...