From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14234 invoked by alias); 12 Feb 2012 20:29:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 30210 Received: (qmail 451 invoked from network); 12 Feb 2012 20:29:40 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Received-SPF: neutral (ns1.primenet.com.au: 74.125.82.43 is neither permitted nor denied by SPF record at ntlworld.com) X-ProxyUser-IP: 86.6.29.42 Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:29:29 +0000 From: Peter Stephenson To: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: Bug with bash emulation regarding ':' Message-ID: <20120212202929.4e2f2e98@pws-pc.ntlworld.com> In-Reply-To: <120211130818.ZM10122@torch.brasslantern.com> References: <20120129183644.6d49d237@pws-pc.ntlworld.com> <120131202909.ZM6076@torch.brasslantern.com> <120201082929.ZM7032@torch.brasslantern.com> <20120205201133.3bcd2b7f@pws-pc.ntlworld.com> <120205132146.ZM7315@torch.brasslantern.com> <20120210210411.4e14cc3f@pws-pc.ntlworld.com> <120211130818.ZM10122@torch.brasslantern.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.7; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmHZKfpJpe4VM+f6EDmtGOg3xDRCz2nnOJ/PI2VyEcu78JwJrm//ByTR/5kdBz0qbszTCGV On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:08:18 -0800 Bart Schaefer wrote: > I agree that this covers everything. (It's a bit convoluted that it's > possible for both PF_SHWORDSPLIT and PF_NOSHWORDSPLIT to be true at > the same time, but .) I'm not sure they can be true at the same time, I think they're always in different branches and each paramsubst() passes a fresh set of flags rather than using the ones passed in. > Incidentally, are we in any danger of conflict with the "PF_" prefix > as used in for protocol families? PF_UNIX, PF_INET, etc.? We had quite a lot of PF this and that. I've made them more readable by renaming them to PREFORK. -- Peter Stephenson Web page now at http://homepage.ntlworld.com/p.w.stephenson/