From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15442 invoked by alias); 27 Feb 2012 23:03:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 30293 Received: (qmail 1640 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2012 23:03:53 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at ruderich.org designates 178.63.68.96 as permitted sender) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 00:03:48 +0100 From: Simon Ruderich To: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: zsh 4.3.17 released Message-ID: <20120227230348.GA1859@ruderich.org> References: <20120223224917.669a455c@pws-pc.ntlworld.com> <20120226020215.GA13980@ruderich.org> <20120227165512.GD29532@altlinux.org> <20120227195633.GA24987@ruderich.org> <20120227224337.GA1860@altlinux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=_zucker.schokokeks.org-26330-1330383829-0001-2" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120227224337.GA1860@altlinux.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2011-04-20) --=_zucker.schokokeks.org-26330-1330383829-0001-2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 02:43:37AM +0400, Alexey I. Froloff wrote: > On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 08:56:33PM +0100, Simon Ruderich wrote: >> The tags are already annotated, in fact they are signed (which >> automatically creates an annotated tag). > No, it is not. But since you don't understand the difference, > I won't insist. Then please tell me the difference, I always thought -s would imply -a - if that's wrong I want to know it. I used the following command to create the tag: % git tag -s .. -m ".." I just retried it (locally) with: % git tag -a -s .. -m ".." But I can't see the difference. Regards, Simon --=20 + privacy is necessary + using gnupg http://gnupg.org + public key id: 0x92FEFDB7E44C32F9 --=_zucker.schokokeks.org-26330-1330383829-0001-2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPTAvUAAoJEJL+/bfkTDL5SuYP/1vT9LX787uiK/hDiNTCffrr 39LfgEPOiqn0jw0BmpL0ACo9fJPM0mv4DBY+PztgrFP1Ie1QAzokBAuCXyMqt48P 8Nlrj38yyb1vxoNkBu8wGuiwWtgtRpdpcOmFp90vYzAxfKbqqvVkeTH+M22HWvyf ODTdElYOrYhEp3+n5f0ejwbj3Egw/+qG+PG2NZ+1D2Gxh4mxuCyLRg30xoJhjczJ 8cJE/ePmqhzHHZn3UY7prapjeeurH+4Oa8m8OYl5DRSwD8TMWl5Q9R8tAEzlOi7w kgcbWq3+xbhSr36PmQmPZg4Q3YZpG+eAuNoMWVuww1vTM+9WUY2P21R5rX1B03yD KzrSCsOu1DHNCKqFluF6EOKVylfzvA1vGZu21ykGAfbUCkRosIodF1XtzpGVT2s6 +6EcBmj6x4ERsK2G6HASr83bccVpZKfisaumiYfGKtIR+k6pP/WqrK8iFt4hVvR3 GQPE1iplYNwoDwRRC5Id/yaGd7zL68ezj6HUeUv4n4P93LZRlnTC9q2aUzFj9pC0 8ovmPu9kQGtkU3rAOZBjwLg2LtbK/R1PAwFRtU35hkkg/EOkrxRv8fy9twzDj6YU bLUIIVnVyve/ireZxA87GTrb49yZlpwC+pUnRJ9JcT+v4RjjOJpWhqiG+cRkCSii jzHmyzk58YHSVQ+x+6I2 =4mzU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=_zucker.schokokeks.org-26330-1330383829-0001-2--