From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26858 invoked by alias); 6 Aug 2012 06:32:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 30597 Received: (qmail 5946 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2012 06:32:44 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Received-SPF: softfail (ns1.primenet.com.au: transitioning SPF record at spf04.biglobe.ne.jp does not designate 149.20.53.66 as permitted sender) To: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: wcwidth autoconf bug In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 25 Jul 2012 09:03:41 +0000 (UTC)" <20120725090341.7D96114A513@mail.netbsd.org> References: <20120725090341.7D96114A513@mail.netbsd.org> X-Mailer: Cue version 0.8 (111031-0948/takashi) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: <20120806063240.31AFE14A3DF@mail.netbsd.org> Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 06:32:40 +0000 (UTC) From: yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp (YAMAMOTO Takashi) hi, > Not as far as I can see. The programme is designed to return 0 > (success) if it's been through all the stages of the test to see if > wcwidth is present but broken. In that case the variable should be set > to "yes". ah, i misunderstood the intention of the code. thanks for explanation. YAMAMOTO Takashi