From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4215 invoked by alias); 7 Aug 2012 18:38:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 30600 Received: (qmail 13642 invoked from network); 7 Aug 2012 18:38:20 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Received-SPF: neutral (ns1.primenet.com.au: 209.85.215.171 is neither permitted nor denied by SPF record at ntlworld.com) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-proxyuser-ip:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=vMF+A3L3S4j377sWpMDvGPp2nmHk9Pnx1I2NO/kNPnc=; b=BwDPhGANlvHQrVCKi/CY9wz67/R2lvfFllRfCp/ko1T4hxeTbPrrbLztgeKOo+KHtL Zyve8MVb7kScGXhaoXTgKchEXLmIQ3GAfzmYAJmSJqgZ3nOUGGbSOQSINc9GJlwW++x8 4abjhch7av99OQ+vHFHEX8srfKGGWsNB6OkClQoFhX6LpRpUBuuccIvm6QF67jbZFZc2 LQWqbNlCfLZ7Y1ZDNl4TOaOFbBXYJ4ppyu2WIIS7MyzOc/MmqPXzSNboiqqFhjubD1CM CTJWCDa0BFgoWKC4YCL4eJ01ZwaUj9wlrjkmqEi96j7lj7C2FpYb+/El5ChmdCFmJMLy jHGQ== X-ProxyUser-IP: 86.6.16.18 Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 19:38:09 +0100 From: Peter Stephenson To: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: wcwidth autoconf bug Message-ID: <20120807193809.1f47d59b@pws-pc.ntlworld.com> In-Reply-To: <20120807031251.ECE9914A601@mail.netbsd.org> References: <20120806063240.31AFE14A3DF@mail.netbsd.org> <20120807031251.ECE9914A601@mail.netbsd.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.7; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmbKpL/vUcbGdERxLsM8erS/SUtSATSLZS8U2Y1iZJjzIvabzzfzAO4Pp+tnK671URbctvi On Tue, 7 Aug 2012 03:12:51 +0000 (UTC) yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote: > even if libc wcwidth is broken in the sense of this test, > it has a far better chance to work than the alternative implementation > on non-__STDC_ISO_10646__ platforms. Right, you mean the replacement wcwidth() contains explicit Unicode characters, so if wchar_t doesn't use Unicode code points it's not doing us a lot of good. I've committed it, thanks. -- Peter Stephenson Web page now at http://homepage.ntlworld.com/p.w.stephenson/