From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-30829-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 28745 invoked by alias); 4 Dec 2012 16:17:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 30829
Received: (qmail 27365 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2012 16:17:21 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,
	SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at samsung.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
X-AuditID: cbfec7f5-b7fd76d000007247-1a-50be1fb30a0d
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 16:07:14 +0000
From: Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@samsung.com>
To: zsh-workers@zsh.org
Subject: Re: Those patches Re: $[ 09.5 ]  -- bad math expression
Message-id: <20121204160714.26bb2dfe@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
In-reply-to: <121204075226.ZM22028@torch.brasslantern.com>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1212022323450.27859@oreo.lan>
 <20121202210516.66e31219@pws-pc.ntlworld.com>
 <121204075226.ZM22028@torch.brasslantern.com>
Organization: Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.0; i386-redhat-linux-gnu)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker:
 H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFuplluLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42I5/e/4Nd3N8vsCDHbe4bY42PyQyYHRY9XB
	D0wBjFFcNimpOZllqUX6dglcGV/eXWAv6GCpWLKolamBcT5zFyMnh4SAicTd9u0sELaYxIV7
	69m6GLk4hASWMkqcXvCDHcJZziSxeelSsA4WAVWJY6tvgXWwCRhKTN00mxHEFhEQlzi79jxY
	XFjAQaLx8RZWEJtXwF5ic9MloKkcHJwCVhJHJgZBzJzFKPHr4Q2wen4BfYmrfz8xQVxhLzHz
	yhlGiF5BiR+T74HVMAtoSWze1sQKYctLbF7zlnkCI9AUhLJZSMpmISlbwMi8ilE0tTS5oDgp
	PddIrzgxt7g0L10vOT93EyMkCL/uYFx6zOoQowAHoxIP74r3ewKEWBPLiitzDzFKcDArifAq
	fNgbIMSbklhZlVqUH19UmpNafIiRiYNTqoGxa0VvG68d85S6nPmHpkxr7tO1KsqKTHCcaLd/
	84xlLK63fuwLSpBNY/zXzlf0P+bwvP/FLpWrdEu51ybcTs8tXegrrdax0/HWlSsN9iEP/zvt
	mKP72Ulx9kzeLCaLbd/4W2vKJfw/TE7mOrfQY5WpP5NsnumH6P2Hko4JrUkzmt6iztf1+IwS
	S3FGoqEWc1FxIgAB68fAIAIAAA==

On Tue, 04 Dec 2012 07:52:26 -0800
Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com> wrote:
> We have two patches for this.  PWS (users/17447) seems to have found
> a bug with OCTAL_ZEROES that my patch (17445) won't address, though
> I'm not sure what that bug is.

I don't believe that any more.  The code is just skipping leading zeroes
for floating point constants in an ever so slightly obscure way.
My change makes it a bit clearer but less efficient.  I don't think
there's any problem with your change.

pws