From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-30911-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 19884 invoked by alias); 18 Dec 2012 09:36:23 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 30911
Received: (qmail 29833 invoked from network); 18 Dec 2012 09:36:22 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_ALL,
	DKIM_SIGNED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham
	version=3.3.2
Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at spodhuis.org does not designate permitted sender hosts)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=spodhuis.org; s=d201210;
	h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=z05TdLu4xzoGB5/qrffyALBFTqaIPo2p9rKsBozGWcg=;
	b=bu5djZJNlPo4feTkJZVeFk9LK2SJaSyvNqwCMq8UgJTxsDxvvKVWzuQP57z7HkYX0mKgdS+lA8vpmK+M4ahcVACTwFmiTcBauLT9Buydwh1UxEHtBaL2t1ZV1PaDtKt1i0rckD0NfWlH/7BRLnYOFM3XKuDZOpSM3FpR2KpiOzw=;
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 04:36:18 -0500
From: Phil Pennock <zsh-workers+phil.pennock@spodhuis.org>
To: Oliver Kiddle <okiddle@yahoo.co.uk>
Cc: zsh-workers@zsh.org
Subject: Re: PATCH: document git in Etc/zsh-development-guide
Message-ID: <20121218093618.GB11509@redoubt.spodhuis.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Oliver Kiddle <okiddle@yahoo.co.uk>, zsh-workers@zsh.org
References: <20121217085215.GA87227@redoubt.spodhuis.org>
 <20121217101536.6825d808@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
 <20121217110035.GA89579@redoubt.spodhuis.org>
 <9514.1355752226@thecus.kiddle.eu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <9514.1355752226@thecus.kiddle.eu>

On 2012-12-17 at 14:50 +0100, Oliver Kiddle wrote:
> Phil Pennock wrote:
> > Second patch shortly (when CVS responds ... I'd forgotten how much
> > _faster_ git, and even svn, is than CVS).
> 
> Note that my proposed patch in 30877, would already remove this section.
> It'd make things easier if we don't have conflicting patches prepared
> for immediately after the git migration.

I pushed the changes to CVS after making them, figuring that Peter is
working from a fixed point for the 5.0.1 candidates and can either
branch zsh-development-guide if we wants to elide my changes, or keep
the content, because my understanding is that after 5.0.1 goes out,
we'll be on git, so guidance on how to contribute "as of release 5.0.1"
will require git.

Made more sense to me for the content to be in, so I committed as per
usual, so that instead of endless debate there's something solid in the
repo which can be patched if there's a need.

-Phil