From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-30952-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 8653 invoked by alias); 7 Jan 2013 09:47:58 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 30952
Received: (qmail 23742 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2013 09:47:46 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,
	SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at samsung.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
X-AuditID: cbfec7f5-b7fd76d000007247-ca-50ea99bef773
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 09:47:40 +0000
From: Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@samsung.com>
To: zsh-workers@zsh.org
Subject: Re: read -q broken on OSX / BSD?
Message-id: <20130107094740.66f559a9@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
In-reply-to: <130106141307.ZM2510@torch.brasslantern.com>
References:
 <CAPzVZKkeEr_oHVkv-mpudxCN=k=sP4PyvyCTofi3+JaP=fJafw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20130106184743.6325554b@pws-pc.ntlworld.com>
 <130106141307.ZM2510@torch.brasslantern.com>
Organization: Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.0; i386-redhat-linux-gnu)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker:
 H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFuphluLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42I5/e/4Nd19M18FGFw4y2pxsPkhkwOjx6qD
	H5gCGKO4bFJSczLLUov07RK4MjZdvcNUsJ+1YsEV+wbGhSxdjBwcEgImEit+GXcxcgKZYhIX
	7q1n62Lk4hASWMoosaX/FyuEs5xJ4ujnbmaQKhYBVYn/P/4zgdhsAoYSUzfNZgSxRQTEJc6u
	Pc8CYgsLaEr839YJZvMK2EvM3LwOzOYUsJR4uvMf1IaNjBLbTjSwgyT4BfQlrv79xARxBlDD
	lTOMEM2CEj8m3wNrZhbQkti8rYkVwpaX2LzmLfMERoFZSMpmISmbhaRsASPzKkbR1NLkguKk
	9FwjveLE3OLSvHS95PzcTYyQEPy6g3HpMatDjAIcjEo8vBcMXgUIsSaWFVfmHmKU4GBWEuG1
	6QIK8aYkVlalFuXHF5XmpBYfYmTi4JRqYJSYMnVF/eXqC492x5jwpk/zkllxtV2M745G/Uyu
	k+t1P904fDvAuOP4XEXrA/NM1c8usvm9vS9hVcy/5vM+u9izPptNivPd8jb7+IFU3YY0hl7W
	lOmzPYv9lnK9aRM/eyP/s3j0z/yTLTn7GB8IyyWlHGKek5788PGk0LD/njFl65r+FmjfV1Vi
	Kc5INNRiLipOBAB2ROKUHwIAAA==

On Sun, 06 Jan 2013 14:13:07 -0800
Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com> wrote:
> On Jan 6,  6:47pm, Peter Stephenson wrote:
> }
> } That does seem to have gone missing.
> 
> So we have competing patches again.  I've already committed mine, but
> it seems I may have gotten the value of bptr wrong?

Yes, I don't think it should include the null.

Now I look, if we're going to tinker like that, the zfree(buf, bptr -
buf + 1) becomes a bit dodgy, too.

-- 
Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@samsung.com>       Consultant, Software
Tel: +44 (0)1223 434724              Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre
St John's House, St John's Innovation Park,
Cowley Road, Cambridge, CB4 0ZT, UK