From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 99 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2013 09:45:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 30977 Received: (qmail 17888 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2013 09:45:04 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at samsung.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) X-AuditID: cbfec7f4-b7f6d6d000001620-34-50f6769cf4c6 Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 09:44:58 +0000 From: Peter Stephenson To: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: SIGPIPE echoing to fifo exits zsh Message-id: <20130116094458.0e3edc4d@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> In-reply-to: <130115185341.ZM18422@torch.brasslantern.com> References: <87r4lmlae4.fsf@gmail.com> <20130115231654.GB2518@localhost.localdomain> <130115185341.ZM18422@torch.brasslantern.com> Organization: Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.0; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFupjluLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42I5/e/4Fd05Zd8CDG7e5LU42PyQyYHRY9XB D0wBjFFcNimpOZllqUX6dglcGT3fLrIX9LBUfG0/wdzAOJ+5i5GTQ0LAROLXmdssELaYxIV7 69m6GLk4hASWMkrsen+VCcJZxiSxfO59sCoWAVWJL9MWsoPYbAKGElM3zWYEsUUExCXOrj0P ViMsoCfRPek5WA2vgL3Enz3tYDangJXEhGV3WSCGtjFKvD99B6yBX0Bf4urfT0wQZ9hLzLxy hhGiWVDix+R7YDXMAloSm7c1sULY8hKb17xlnsAoMAtJ2SwkZbOQlC1gZF7FKJpamlxQnJSe a6hXnJhbXJqXrpecn7uJERKGX3YwLj5mdYhRgINRiYf3Y97XACHWxLLiytxDjBIczEoivMvs vwUI8aYkVlalFuXHF5XmpBYfYmTi4JRqYLQ5J79p57vihU+0diicnfd4zs1ynmNBAdPYtizj /hnCETyhSPDSsrsrru7ZrTVnn6T5dqakTxPlN524eO38BRYeCUHFa0xc3tJ3VjRYGW47F3Ze IXMqc+cEle/rKgNmqHIeOm7FH/Db2vaU/YllF4suPAnsiK8vPrRZaPt+s1nGn/kndK+c2v5D iaU4I9FQi7moOBEAJ2neWyECAAA= On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 18:53:41 -0800 Bart Schaefer wrote: > Hrm. If this were a script instead of an interactive command at the > prompt, the correct behavior would in fact be to exit on SIGPIPE. I > don't know offhand if that's also (per POSIX spec for example) correct > in this instance. I tried a few shells and got a roughly 50-50 split. As far as I could make out, in fact, bash behaved differently depending whether or not invoked as "sh", but I haven't looked further. pws