From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-31421-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 2188 invoked by alias); 22 May 2013 08:46:14 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 31421
Received: (qmail 17952 invoked from network); 22 May 2013 08:46:07 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,
	SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at samsung.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
X-AuditID: cbfec7f5-b7f376d000001ec6-98-519c85ca9667
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 09:46:01 +0100
From: Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@samsung.com>
To: zsh-workers@zsh.org
Subject: Re: Missing "--" in the "age" function
Message-id: <20130522094601.4bdd8fbe@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
In-reply-to: <20130521191022.GB9976@chaz.gmail.com>
References: <20130521115332.GA9976@chaz.gmail.com>
 <20130521161928.5c59471f@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
 <20130521191022.GB9976@chaz.gmail.com>
Organization: Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.0; i386-redhat-linux-gnu)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker:
 H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFuplluLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42I5/e/4Nd1TrXMCDeb/lbY42PyQyYHRY9XB
	D0wBjFFcNimpOZllqUX6dglcGY9WL2Mp+MRWceKFQgPjWtYuRk4OCQETidWTXzJB2GISF+6t
	Z+ti5OIQEljKKNF25D0LhLOcSWLJs9VgHSwCqhJvVs5hA7HZBAwlpm6azQhiiwiIS5xde54F
	xBYW0JfofnQArJ5XwF5i6cstzCA2p4CxxM4Jx9khhk5klOj6uIUdJMEP1HD17yeoM+wlZl45
	wwjRLCjxY/I9sKHMAloSm7c1sULY8hKb17xlnsAoMAtJ2SwkZbOQlC1gZF7FKJpamlxQnJSe
	a6RXnJhbXJqXrpecn7uJERKEX3cwLj1mdYhRgINRiYf3Ye3sQCHWxLLiytxDjBIczEoivApB
	cwKFeFMSK6tSi/Lji0pzUosPMTJxcEo1MLL+5Dj8t6Gtvz4wUjxe7Ms8vnMfpFU1JN6/FHyV
	FDN1UWn9Eub+ssqjpRO2LCr4bvO99+OB7Ptfmb9ZtW+MPOAU2VuuFPwgYs/ivn3xjAFpu8Lk
	NtxWLhDq+W19cULT7I4Ik2Pb3L5fNnaonKZ0N7iJKUtSJ2mHWQLf1DmhrhpbdxwRi+d6p8RS
	nJFoqMVcVJwIAIkxcBMgAgAA

On Tue, 21 May 2013 20:10:22 +0100
Stephane Chazelas <stephane.chazelas@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2013-05-21 16:19:28 +0100, Peter Stephenson:
> [...]
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> > +example(print *+LPAR()e-age :file1 :file2-+RPAR())
> > +
> > +This matches all files modified no earlier than tt(file1) and
> > +no later than tt(file2).
> [...]
> 
> In that case, shouldn't it be:
> 
> zstat -A tmp -F "%Y/%m/%d:%H:%M:%S"...
> 
> instead of 
> 
> zstat -A tmp -F "%Y/%m/%d"...

Hmm, it's a bit overloaded.  If you give an explicit date (just one),
you'd get files modified on that date; if you give a time as well the
start point moves up to that time; that's most useful with two arguments
to give a range.

Maybe the most convenient thing is if you give one :file argument it
uses the date, and if there is a second argument it uses the date and
time for both?

pws