From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20020 invoked by alias); 8 Jun 2013 18:55:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 31464 Received: (qmail 22584 invoked from network); 8 Jun 2013 18:54:59 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at schrab.com designates 50.116.43.67 as permitted sender) Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2013 14:45:09 -0400 From: Aaron Schrab To: Hong Xu Cc: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: Update .editorconfig file: comment lines should occupy individual lines Message-ID: <20130608184509.GC4604@pug.qqx.org> Mail-Followup-To: Hong Xu , zsh-workers@zsh.org References: <51B2DE1B.4090701@topbug.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <51B2DE1B.4090701@topbug.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21+145 (gd0ebb66) (2011-07-01) At 00:32 -0700 08 Jun 2013, Hong Xu wrote: >The attachment fixes an issue of the .editorconfig file in the zsh >repository: comments should occupy individual lines, but not be >appended to another line. Responding as the person who originally submitted the .editorconfig file here. The file format details section of the editorconfig website doesn't say anything about comments needing to be on separate lines, I guess that's expected to be understood when it states that the format is based on INI files. I'd say that should be clarified. But, since you're one of the initiators of the format, I'll defer to you on that detail. At worst, having an extra newline certainly shouldn't hurt anything.