From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-31713-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 12893 invoked by alias); 9 Sep 2013 10:09:45 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 31713
Received: (qmail 22095 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2013 10:09:39 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,
	SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at samsung.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
X-AuditID: cbfec7f5-b7ef66d00000795a-db-522d9c036cee
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2013 10:59:29 +0100
From: Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@samsung.com>
To: zsh-workers@zsh.org
Subject: Re: Directory completion acts as if CHASE_LINKS is set
Message-id: <20130909105929.6dd0c0d6@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
In-reply-to: <130908142628.ZM27141@torch.brasslantern.com>
References: <l08meg$v06$1@ger.gmane.org>
 <130905083139.ZM29859@torch.brasslantern.com>
 <20130906210938.30f56d8e@pws-pc.ntlworld.com>
 <130906220300.ZM31578@torch.brasslantern.com>
 <20130908185136.711ad4ca@pws-pc.ntlworld.com>
 <130908142628.ZM27141@torch.brasslantern.com>
Organization: Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.0; i386-redhat-linux-gnu)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker:
 H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFuplluLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42I5/e/4VV3mObpBBtM/C1kcbH7I5MDoserg
	B6YAxigum5TUnMyy1CJ9uwSujJaDD9kK3jFV9Kw9yNLAuIipi5GTQ0LARGLdhelQtpjEhXvr
	2UBsIYGljBIPf/F1MXIB2cuZJKZfmAFWxCKgKvFo1mF2EJtNwFBi6qbZjCC2iIC4xNm151lA
	bGEBe4knm7eC2bxA9vbGNWA2p4CVxPaez2wQQ2cwSbQv3sYMkuAX0Je4+vcT1BX2EjOvnGGE
	aBaU+DH5Hlgzs4CWxOZtTawQtrzE5jVvmScwCsxCUjYLSdksJGULGJlXMYqmliYXFCel5xrp
	FSfmFpfmpesl5+duYoQE4dcdjEuPWR1iFOBgVOLhlfivEyTEmlhWXJl7iFGCg1lJhPfNTN0g
	Id6UxMqq1KL8+KLSnNTiQ4xMHJxSDYwOU+uX/ObTZtrDdoKFL3VxVv1cnfo1X56dLI9/USi4
	/8p87SZH0Qv6X+ZoVH2KtnxTOnUbi9yWiQkb+fm7Gy6EOJ2eoHa91HLti3zjjnuLPzL21l5V
	tg4vULlh0att1c1iWbrYv/aENCs/02KbJx29jlXdoVfuhPzeMfvV3g+5/k+3zDtSeFaJpTgj
	0VCLuag4EQD39dPhIAIAAA==

On Sun, 08 Sep 2013 14:26:28 -0700
Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com> wrote:
> Remaining question is whether to use ${IPREFIX}${PREFIX%/*}.  I did in
> the assignment but not in the $(cd ...) as I can't think of a case for
> cd where IPREFIX would have a useful value.

Doesn't seem to make a material difference that I can think of right
now.

pws