From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20686 invoked by alias); 13 Sep 2013 12:24:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 31721 Received: (qmail 10762 invoked from network); 13 Sep 2013 12:24:30 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FAKE_REPLY_C autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at sym2.noone.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 14:24:26 +0200 From: Axel Beckert To: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: Segfault on "task " with zsh 5.0.2 Message-ID: <20130913122426.GA19439@sym.noone.org> Mail-Followup-To: zsh-workers@zsh.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130913125139.63c57968@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> <20130913093732.25326b25@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> X-Operating-System: Linux 2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 X-Machine: sym2 x86_64 X-Editor: GNU Emacs 23.2.1 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAAAAAC3mUtaAAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAADh0RVh0U29mdHdhcmUAWFYgVmVyc2lvbiAzLjEwYSAgUmV2OiAxMi8yOS85NCAoUE5HIHBhdGNoIDEuMindFS5JAAACGElEQVQ4jXXQMU8UYRDG8f8shNjdDH4AbpfGDjAWlKiJiZ0ajL1aGCvsNCbGaCGG1koLaztaTYz6ATy+gOyehYmF3MxVxgg3FnDsHcTpJr/M+8w7Rf6nCsaVTTDqxbg9hoOXmw83H71+Eyfg4E1d7/Z2fG9rGkZbTQiu+K+3U/C+76lmkvAhJuDndnoAiftou4V84okAGclop4U/jYACZDTxrYWP0gkxVfAm/W//GLZpxIzwIN0Hn8dw0B+IWkZmQmRsj2HfhwokEklHfNCCiQCRgAR7YyhQVRVTCKCzP4Y5zBBE0t0zY3Q8oQaBqqAMlVEcgVQd9706zGirAFium8HXumlMIeMwqQCInju+2+uB6MRENupdpMt8pRlHZyuAW0F+Mb6XSIVqtxjD+iVmVqqystLEzFTGT92YqRaXpNT5eTVjeJhbALPnrTxLUZUKZsgxcNm64hAOYisT/xhF+oKTGU5RegtC3Rt6eEDi/QnIevdTx9Md2EMmYBRmCQR1026FCGQQJJExsRUqgkMGaWSbwYLnoO4T6VgpbQbdELPMBAHWWrhYrcxXnYgAsatPWygkFCBD4K62MAsOTqA6szYRPpsu6e6Y8mPiVrBMNuGIMrgwBUu4p2DgG1Ownu6hpuTv7hScefHAzAC/yRRw5U5pALMbJ4AUALvHSZhxgHPXTsHcdWD1GadAHr9avP+c0wCr7263Df8ASLwXWHWs+KIAAAAHdElNRQfYBQEBODPr Organization: DeuxChevaux.org -- The =?iso-8859-1?Q?Citr?= =?iso-8859-1?B?b+tu?= 2CV Database User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Hi Peter, On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 09:37:32AM +0100, Peter Stephenson wrote: > Looks like a memory error. Does valgrind give any extra hints? On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:51:39PM +0100, Peter Stephenson wrote: > Might not be related, but it's hard to be sure --- if there is bad > memory around, the completion system has a good chance of being the part > that falls over it. Ah, did you mean malfunctioning RAM as in "hardware defect"? But shouldn't it be then less easy to reproduce as different memory areas should be in use when trying it a day later or so? The machine is a Xen DomU virtual machine btw. -- not sure if that makes a difference here. > cap_get_proc() is a library call with no arguments, > but it does do allocation --- if you have zsh's own memory allocation > built in there If ansi2knr or gcc 4.7 vs 4.8 doesn't change anything there, there should be no difference in compile time options between to 5.0.2 compilation which segfaults and the one which doesn't. Kind regards, Axel -- /~\ Plain Text Ribbon Campaign | Axel Beckert \ / Say No to HTML in E-Mail and News | abe@deuxchevaux.org (Mail) X See http://www.asciiribbon.org/ | abe@noone.org (Mail+Jabber) / \ I love long mails: http://email.is-not-s.ms/ | http://noone.org/abe/ (Web)