From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2791 invoked by alias); 13 Sep 2013 12:36:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 31722 Received: (qmail 3321 invoked from network); 13 Sep 2013 12:36:29 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at samsung.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) X-AuditID: cbfec7f4-b7f0a6d000007b1b-5e-523306c90713 Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 13:36:25 +0100 From: Peter Stephenson To: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: Segfault on "task " with zsh 5.0.2 Message-id: <20130913133625.56914123@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> In-reply-to: <20130913122426.GA19439@sym.noone.org> References: <20130913093732.25326b25@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> <20130913122426.GA19439@sym.noone.org> Organization: Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.0; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFupkluLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42I5/e/4Fd1TbMZBBm12FgebHzI5MHqsOviB KYAxissmJTUnsyy1SN8ugSuja/Yl5oL/zBUXPpo2ME5k7mLk5JAQMJE4PeEBC4QtJnHh3no2 EFtIYCmjxN3ZFV2MXED2ciaJPedOM3UxcnCwCKhKnH6SCFLDJmAoMXXTbEYQW0RAXOLs2vNg c4QFLCW6N54Bi/MK2Essf3oIzOYUMJa4tukJ1PwMiU/z7oHZ/AL6Elf/fmKCuMFeYuYVmF5B iR+T74HNZBbQkti8rYkVwpaX2LzmLfMERoFZSMpmISmbhaRsASPzKkbR1NLkguKk9FxDveLE 3OLSvHS95PzcTYyQ4Puyg3HxMatDjAIcjEo8vBOSjYKEWBPLiitzDzFKcDArifDOugsU4k1J rKxKLcqPLyrNSS0+xMjEwSnVwKj8Knea8ocJvY6Xfx+rFtIy431VbtqUwzbn5WJGyULFZY+e 7WY48VGOcangt/VbjrzQLMrLF1sY07Ux36HrdExrRaGtBMdFufnHZm2/JzWt/+uk1Z///3s8 S0p58euWsN/95m4r6s9OSX72V2RG9MtjB/hN34TOMuRsZ76zRHXrPWsLlnOZnNZKLMUZiYZa zEXFiQCgpZOWHAIAAA== On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 14:24:26 +0200 Axel Beckert wrote: > On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:51:39PM +0100, Peter Stephenson wrote: > > Might not be related, but it's hard to be sure --- if there is bad > > memory around, the completion system has a good chance of being the part > > that falls over it. > > Ah, did you mean malfunctioning RAM as in "hardware defect"? No, I meant e.g. memory that had been freed and then reallocated but was still being used by something else. pws