From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-32381-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 21029 invoked by alias); 13 Feb 2014 09:42:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 32381
Received: (qmail 23019 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2014 09:42:44 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,
	SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-AuditID: cbfec7f4-b7f796d000005a13-1f-52fc91346311
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 09:32:35 +0000
From: Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@samsung.com>
To: zsh-workers@zsh.org
Subject: Re: Commit 137b15a fails X02zlevi test
Message-id: <20140213093235.0abad014@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
In-reply-to: <140212214922.ZM25943@torch.brasslantern.com>
References: <140208121311.ZM14905@torch.brasslantern.com>
 <140208144555.ZM16333@torch.brasslantern.com>
 <140209105343.ZM24252@torch.brasslantern.com> <17919.1391985011@quattro>
 <140210233703.ZM11806@torch.brasslantern.com>
 <140212214922.ZM25943@torch.brasslantern.com>
Organization: Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.0; i386-redhat-linux-gnu)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker:
 H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFupmluLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42I5/e/4NV2TiX+CDHofiFgcbH7I5MDoserg
	B6YAxigum5TUnMyy1CJ9uwSujCMfu9gKOpkrXs7dwNbAuJWpi5GTQ0LARGLm7zmsELaYxIV7
	69lAbCGBpYwSX2fndDFyAdnLmSTaH3eBFbEIqEq0rWkCs9kEDCWmbprNCGKLCIhLnF17nqWL
	kYNDWEBf4vvMfJAwr4C9xKT3H5hAwpwCVhILNglDjJzCJLGqfQYLSA0/UPnVv5+g7rGXmHnl
	DCNEr6DEj8n3wGqYBbQkNm+DWMssIC+xec1b5gmMArOQlM1CUjYLSdkCRuZVjKKppckFxUnp
	uYZ6xYm5xaV56XrJ+bmbGCEB+GUH4+JjVocYBTgYlXh4LZb9DhJiTSwrrsw9xCjBwawkwisj
	8SdIiDclsbIqtSg/vqg0J7X4ECMTB6dUA2OpsfzetILFLYs/ic1VFd3FXRmoza10Yu6+Ve9F
	PTIWBYiomu47ZLT2XPQpmRPvLv1cvo3zv6yV+LwzwWcFhHl+zLJidvq2kvvI3f4Nji0vN/3i
	iO17Vb/m2Z39Ze6rks/9YVAQjvgS0cnhbi0U8ONW5aeT2/T3yMzeHfxp6pPE9FLnVculnC4p
	sRRnJBpqMRcVJwIAUruh9B4CAAA=

On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 21:49:22 -0800
Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com> wrote:
> On Feb 10, 11:37pm, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> }
> } The following reformulation works more than 90% of the time for me,
> } but still fails occasionally, and still not always on the same test.
> 
> Anyone object if I commit/push this?

Certainly appears to be the best there is at the moment.

pws