From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26568 invoked by alias); 17 Mar 2014 16:28:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 32495 Received: (qmail 18634 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2014 16:28:41 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-AuditID: cbfec7f5-b7fc96d000004885-8e-5327205891f5 Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 16:18:31 +0000 From: Peter Stephenson To: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: A possible fix of an indentation problem in manages Message-id: <20140317161831.5483f275@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> In-reply-to: <10AF07DF-B78A-4EDD-8DD2-4E0766CA8E96@kba.biglobe.ne.jp> References: <10AF07DF-B78A-4EDD-8DD2-4E0766CA8E96@kba.biglobe.ne.jp> Organization: Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.0; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFuphluLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42I5/e/4Vd0IBfVgg6Pz1S0ONj9kcmD0WHXw A1MAYxSXTUpqTmZZapG+XQJXxvL5X1kLWlkqvh4/xdzAOIu5i5GDQ0LAROJQW2UXIyeQKSZx 4d56ti5GLg4hgaWMEv07prJDOMuZJCZc6GMHqWIRUJXY+HUJG4jNJmAoMXXTbEYQW0RAXOLs 2vMsILawgIPEnobNzCA2r4C9xIVPv8HinAKuEj83ngabIyTgIvG2+xNYnF9AX+Lq309MEFfY S8y8coYRoldQ4sfke2A1zAJaEpu3NbFC2PISm9e8ZZ7AKDALSdksJGWzkJQtYGRexSiaWppc UJyUnmukV5yYW1yal66XnJ+7iRESgl93MC49ZnWIUYCDUYmH9yWberAQa2JZcWXuIUYJDmYl Ed5LvEAh3pTEyqrUovz4otKc1OJDjEwcnFINjAJbV18/evrHRJ2lT6WfMwmET87lOP17gx7n lpRJ0h9fn+aanrNX2z9+nnXBrwsTvgR56sw9Uj7V87yVgIbmDR45nxXh5SdXLDKbXBOxMvxb cXn+p2p7Y1YWF4WUP6z3S3zORi1VTFc8+ut9/eqcn24n/Vc+Ty0tOZjxNNJ4UvqylicfzSyd FymxFGckGmoxFxUnAgBQthktHwIAAA== On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 01:01:32 +0900 "Jun T." wrote: > As pointed out in the above post, indentation of the text in the > description of _arguments in zshcompsys.1 has a problem. > > The following patch *seems* to fix the problem, at least for the current > manpages. But even if it works, there may be a better way than to > re-re-define ENDITEM... Looks OK here. Let's suck it and see; I can't imagine me staring at the problem is going to provide anything better. pws