From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21856 invoked by alias); 15 Apr 2014 17:38:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 32549 Received: (qmail 23169 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2014 17:37:46 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-AuditID: cbfec7f4-b7f796d000005a13-bb-534d6c095267 Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 18:27:35 +0100 From: Peter Stephenson To: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: ignore-parents style broken for cd Message-id: <20140415182735.2e65cdb5@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> In-reply-to: <140415095631.ZM17820@torch.brasslantern.com> References: <736C1D9E-722A-425E-9F23-C9786BCB5C72@kba.biglobe.ne.jp> <140415095631.ZM17820@torch.brasslantern.com> Organization: Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.0; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFupmluLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42I5/e/4VV3OHN9gg86pPBYHmx8yOTB6rDr4 gSmAMYrLJiU1J7MstUjfLoErY9KNDawFN5krnu6UamD8ztTFyMkhIWAicXL2WVYIW0ziwr31 bF2MXBxCAksZJV7f6gQrEhJYziSx4mMViM0ioCrxYnMHG4jNJmAoMXXTbEYQW0RAXOLs2vMs ILawgL7EtjmdYEN5BewlTi2YywxicwpYSVzeMZMZYmaJxJ1bk8F6+YHqr/79BHWQvcTMK2cY IXoFJX5Mvgc2k1lAS2LztiZWCFteYvOat8wTGAVmISmbhaRsFpKyBYzMqxhFU0uTC4qT0nMN 9YoTc4tL89L1kvNzNzFCAvDLDsbFx6wOMQpwMCrx8Dpk+QYLsSaWFVfmHmKU4GBWEuH9FQ8U 4k1JrKxKLcqPLyrNSS0+xMjEwQkMyJWV5tys82cI1AWfrJ2XM39VvpaUL9M287tcXur/cidN 2GB2dlpMkarfR+FULWlD9jn7/TcVRXWs1nl5tZJ9uxNLZrdezEuuNf80l+S9+6YS9jVtrhmz 8oxXMRcv963bXewadOd56q6i/GkObSe8PQ/wZO+1rRYNNOUtYDKJFp3XwZ5d3qGqxFKckWio xVxUnAgA01xiaB4CAAA= On Tue, 15 Apr 2014 09:56:31 -0700 Bart Schaefer wrote: > } The patch below is my try, but I don't (and will never) > } understand any details of _path_files. > > I'm not sure that anyone really understands _path_files in its entirety ... It's possible to understand small chunks of it, but trying to expand that knowledge to include the rest of the file is as futile as trying to mark all the trees in the Hundred Acre Wood. pws