From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-32554-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 10783 invoked by alias); 16 Apr 2014 06:25:08 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 32554
Received: (qmail 13546 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2014 06:25:02 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 16:19:42 +1000
From: Andrew Waldron <a.a.w@gmx.us>
To: zsh workers <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Subject: Re: SegFault in stringsubst
Message-ID: <20140416061549.GA31591@ewok>
References: <20140416044612.GB24565@ewok>
 <140415221511.ZM18252@torch.brasslantern.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <140415221511.ZM18252@torch.brasslantern.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-Provags-ID:  V03:K0:9+WM7jQz5P2Bkmmt+kGBKIIPePoms/faeQIHOt1unXkgZIOdN/j
 Tqd58+6Fn6yhfcDeGadXDRbM//0qwFDubVuxPwE566uMaGdB1Ln5bdR8HA98YaOCobdWL5B
 jkJtZisGjMTWmpaaTJRS78aM1H9DLE1lSSO2lvq5xwpH2Gbv3vQD6b9wjUktEUWGpFuVU8K
 vatEydUqOBcn00JGhBWnA==

On Tue, 15 Apr 2014, Bart Schaefer wrote:

> The exec.c change doesn't change anything other than verbosity about some
> error conditions, correct?

Correct, if you take the change in stringsubst then there is no segfault.
You just end up with empty substitutions.

Regards
Andrew.