From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28050 invoked by alias); 4 Jun 2014 15:26:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 32705 Received: (qmail 16406 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2014 15:26:29 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-AuditID: cbfec7f4-b7fac6d000006cfe-9e-538f3aa14c68 Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 16:26:20 +0100 From: Peter Stephenson To: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: History bug in zsh 5.0.5 Message-id: <20140604162620.07d36f3b@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> In-reply-to: <20140604150941.GL7931@sym.noone.org> References: <8020140C-4E21-4136-BA9B-D258065847E5@gmail.com> <20140604150941.GL7931@sym.noone.org> Organization: Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.0; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFupmluLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42I5/e/4Nd1FVv3BBmfkLA42P2RyYPRYdfAD UwBjFJdNSmpOZllqkb5dAlfG+cZN7AWLmSueXI5pYLzE1MXIySEhYCLx69VxNghbTOLCvfVA NheHkMBSRokDe3ayQjjLmSR+984Hq2IRUJX4+OQwI4jNJmAoMXXTbDBbREBc4uza8ywgtjBQ zfLOdewgNq+AvcS79WvB4pwCRhJvFzxgBbGFBFIkri9fDjaTX0Bf4urfT1AX2UvMvHKGEaJX UOLH5HtgvcwCWhKbtzWxQtjyEpvXvGWewCgwC0nZLCRls5CULWBkXsUomlqaXFCclJ5rqFec mFtcmpeul5yfu4kREoBfdjAuPmZ1iFGAg1GJh/eDbl+wEGtiWXFl7iFGCQ5mJRFeM5X+YCHe lMTKqtSi/Pii0pzU4kOMTBycUg2M1RwJOzQ+xL1JtTkc0RFyZb+jTqjjoU0l+79c0tOKSMkP cOAVyTsfWdOpFePiuGTLuw+qT2Nf7f98r/6aq/edVQvmVFdnx/qfVthky7t07uPY1sl3Qr52 mJ15bnvohc1/xn9tl5dm3kvfHejeaD6792/Hpy1+t6ylwot2bFD3b+TxbtmS6demxFKckWio xVxUnAgAVTax7B4CAAA= On Wed, 04 Jun 2014 17:09:42 +0200 Axel Beckert wrote: > But I thought so first, too. :-) There's no sleep or such in > RoboSloNE's report and it's about SHARE_HISTORY which > zsh-workers/32682 isn't (IIRC). However, INC_APPEND_HISTORY is set, according to the report . It shouldn't be if the behaviour you want is the (pure) SHARE_HISTORY one. So it probably is the same issue. pws